Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Anders Lee Sam Gagner

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerAnders Lee: Goals, 0.33 a game, 90th percentileAnders Lee: Assists, 0.21 a game, 45th percentileAnders Lee: Points, 0.54 a game, 68th percentileAnders Lee: Shots, 2.59 a game, 86th percentileAnders Lee: Hits, 2.22 a game, 85th percentileAnders Lee: Corsi for %, 54.0%, 80th percentileAnders Lee: CF% rel, 1.6, 65th percentileAnders Lee: On-ice xG %, 57.1%, 92nd percentileAnders Lee: Rating, +6.6 goals above replacement, 76th percentileAnders Lee: Chances created, 1.40 xG per 60, 99th percentileAnders Lee: Shot quality, 9.8% a shot, 96th percentileAnders Lee: Finishing, -1.5 goals above expected, 39th percentileSam Gagner: Goals, 0.19 a game, 56th percentileSam Gagner: Assists, 0.32 a game, 69th percentileSam Gagner: Points, 0.51 a game, 63rd percentileSam Gagner: Shots, 2.26 a game, 77th percentileSam Gagner: Hits, 0.78 a game, 27th percentileSam Gagner: Corsi for %, 51.8%, 61st percentileSam Gagner: CF% rel, 4.7, 91st percentileSam Gagner: On-ice xG %, 46.5%, 23rd percentileSam Gagner: Rating, +2.0 goals above replacement, 41st percentileSam Gagner: Chances created, 0.68 xG per 60, 44th percentileSam Gagner: Shot quality, 6.1% a shot, 10th percentileSam Gagner: Finishing, -1.7 goals above expected, 37th percentile
01020304020406080Anders Lee 41Sam Gagner 41

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Anders Lee
Sam Gagner

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Anders Lee L, UTA 2014-15 Sam Gagner C, EDM
76 Games played 81
25 Goals 15
16 Assists 26
41 Points 41
0.54 Points per game 0.51
9 Plus/minus -28
197 Shots 183
12.7 Shooting % 8.2
169 Hits 63
33 Penalty minutes 28
14:24 Average ice time 17:15
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
54.0 Corsi for % 51.8
+1.6 CF% relative to team +4.7
55.5 Fenwick for % 50.0
57.1 Expected goals for % 46.5
+2.8 xGF% relative to team +0.5
57.0 Goals for % 41.2
100.1 PDO 97.6
247 Shot attempts taken 244
Expected goals, all situations
25.5 Expected goals 15.7
1.40 Expected goals per 60 0.68
9.8% Chance per attempt 6.1%
-1.5 Goals above expected -1.7
Rating, in goals
+6.6 Goals above replacement +2.0
+1.1 Wins above replacement +0.3
+6.7 Even-strength offence +0.6
-2.6 Even-strength defence -2.8
-0.2 Power play +1.0
+0.1 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.4 Penalties -0.7
Contract
$851K Cap hit $4.8M
$21K Cap dollars per point $117K
$4.5M Worth at the going rate $1.8M
+$3.7M Value: worth minus cap hit -$3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean