Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2018-19 season

At a glance

Marcus Kruger Riley Nash

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMarcus Kruger: Goals, 0.05 a game, 7th percentileMarcus Kruger: Assists, 0.11 a game, 12th percentileMarcus Kruger: Points, 0.16 a game, 7th percentileMarcus Kruger: Shots, 1.00 a game, 12th percentileMarcus Kruger: Hits, 0.69 a game, 30th percentileMarcus Kruger: Corsi for %, 48.1%, 30th percentileMarcus Kruger: CF% rel, -2.0, 25th percentileMarcus Kruger: On-ice xG %, 47.4%, 28th percentileMarcus Kruger: Rating, +0.3 goals above replacement, 25th percentileMarcus Kruger: Chances created, 0.50 xG per 60, 5th percentileMarcus Kruger: Shot quality, 7.2% a shot, 27th percentileMarcus Kruger: Finishing, -2.4 goals above expected, 31st percentileRiley Nash: Goals, 0.04 a game, 3rd percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.12 a game, 14th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.15 a game, 6th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.01 a game, 14th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 0.92 a game, 46th percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 48.8%, 38th percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, -1.7, 30th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 51.8%, 63rd percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +2.6 goals above replacement, 48th percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 4th percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 7.0% a shot, 19th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -4.8 goals above expected, 10th percentile
0510204060Marcus Kruger 12Riley Nash 12

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Marcus Kruger
Riley Nash

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Marcus Kruger C, CHI 2018-19 Riley Nash C, NYR
74 Games played 78
4 Goals 3
8 Assists 9
12 Points 12
0.16 Points per game 0.15
-2 Plus/minus -8
74 Shots 79
5.4 Shooting % 3.8
51 Hits 72
30 Penalty minutes 19
10:25 Average ice time 10:50
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.1 Corsi for % 48.8
-2.0 CF% relative to team -1.7
50.0 Fenwick for % 50.8
47.4 Expected goals for % 51.8
+1.7 xGF% relative to team +1.1
47.7 Goals for % 34.8
99.1 PDO 95.5
88 Shot attempts taken 121
Expected goals, all situations
6.4 Expected goals 6.8
0.50 Expected goals per 60 0.48
7.2% Chance per attempt 7.0%
-2.4 Goals above expected -4.8
Rating, in goals
+0.3 Goals above replacement +2.6
+0.1 Wins above replacement +0.4
-3.2 Even-strength offence -4.0
+3.2 Even-strength defence +4.6
0.0 Power play -0.1
-0.9 Penalty kill -0.1
-0.9 Penalties -0.1
Contract
$3.083M Cap hit $2.75M
$257K Cap dollars per point $229K
$840K Worth at the going rate $2.4M
-$2.2M Value: worth minus cap hit -$308K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean