Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Nick Jensen Mark Barberio

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNick Jensen: Goals, 0.08 a game, 72nd percentileNick Jensen: Assists, 0.18 a game, 46th percentileNick Jensen: Points, 0.27 a game, 55th percentileNick Jensen: Shots, 1.20 a game, 44th percentileNick Jensen: Hits, 1.12 a game, 45th percentileNick Jensen: Corsi for %, 50.4%, 59th percentileNick Jensen: CF% rel, 2.5, 82nd percentileNick Jensen: On-ice xG %, 52.1%, 72nd percentileNick Jensen: Rating, +4.9 goals above replacement, 74th percentileNick Jensen: Chances created, 0.16 xG per 60, 36th percentileNick Jensen: Shot quality, 2.8% a shot, 36th percentileNick Jensen: Finishing, +1.7 goals above expected, 80th percentileMark Barberio: Goals, 0.03 a game, 26th percentileMark Barberio: Assists, 0.18 a game, 45th percentileMark Barberio: Points, 0.22 a game, 41st percentileMark Barberio: Shots, 1.33 a game, 57th percentileMark Barberio: Hits, 0.33 a game, 3rd percentileMark Barberio: Corsi for %, 51.8%, 76th percentileMark Barberio: CF% rel, 0.5, 58th percentileMark Barberio: On-ice xG %, 47.2%, 27th percentileMark Barberio: Rating, -0.8 goals above replacement, 21st percentileMark Barberio: Chances created, 0.26 xG per 60, 79th percentileMark Barberio: Shot quality, 3.7% a shot, 80th percentileMark Barberio: Finishing, -2.8 goals above expected, 8th percentile
0510204060Nick Jensen 13Mark Barberio 13

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nick Jensen
Mark Barberio

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nick Jensen D, OTT 2016-17 Mark Barberio D, COL
49 Games played 60
4 Goals 2
9 Assists 11
13 Points 13
0.27 Points per game 0.22
-7 Plus/minus -5
59 Shots 80
6.8 Shooting % 2.5
55 Hits 20
12 Penalty minutes 14
17:45 Average ice time 18:16
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.4 Corsi for % 51.8
+2.5 CF% relative to team +0.5
50.7 Fenwick for % 50.1
52.1 Expected goals for % 47.2
+5.0 xGF% relative to team -2.1
44.1 Goals for % 46.9
97.7 PDO 99.3
116 Shot attempts taken 162
Expected goals, all situations
2.3 Expected goals 4.8
0.16 Expected goals per 60 0.26
2.8% Chance per attempt 3.7%
+1.7 Goals above expected -2.8
Rating, in goals
+4.9 Goals above replacement -0.8
+0.8 Wins above replacement -0.1
+1.2 Even-strength offence -0.3
+0.8 Even-strength defence -3.2
0.0 Power play -0.9
-0.5 Penalty kill +0.4
+0.4 Penalties -0.4
Contract
$588K Cap hit $750K
$45K Cap dollars per point $58K
$3.7M Worth at the going rate $92K
+$3.1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$658K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean