Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Nate Prosser Marco Scandella

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Prosser: Goals, 0.02 a game, 20th percentileNate Prosser: Assists, 0.22 a game, 53rd percentileNate Prosser: Points, 0.24 a game, 46th percentileNate Prosser: Shots, 0.63 a game, 11th percentileNate Prosser: Hits, 0.67 a game, 16th percentileNate Prosser: Corsi for %, 43.6%, 3rd percentileNate Prosser: CF% rel, -1.4, 37th percentileNate Prosser: On-ice xG %, 41.9%, 1st percentileNate Prosser: Rating, -2.2 goals above replacement, 9th percentileNate Prosser: Chances created, 0.13 xG per 60, 29th percentileNate Prosser: Shot quality, 4.4% a shot, 93rd percentileNate Prosser: Finishing, -1.1 goals above expected, 30th percentileMarco Scandella: Goals, 0.05 a game, 48th percentileMarco Scandella: Assists, 0.14 a game, 30th percentileMarco Scandella: Points, 0.19 a game, 31st percentileMarco Scandella: Shots, 1.22 a game, 57th percentileMarco Scandella: Hits, 0.73 a game, 22nd percentileMarco Scandella: Corsi for %, 43.4%, 3rd percentileMarco Scandella: CF% rel, -0.4, 49th percentileMarco Scandella: On-ice xG %, 43.8%, 5th percentileMarco Scandella: Rating, +0.8 goals above replacement, 41st percentileMarco Scandella: Chances created, 0.18 xG per 60, 52nd percentileMarco Scandella: Shot quality, 3.6% a shot, 74th percentileMarco Scandella: Finishing, -1.1 goals above expected, 31st percentile
0510204060Nate Prosser 12Marco Scandella 12

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Prosser
Marco Scandella

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Prosser D, PHI 2011-12 Marco Scandella D, STL
51 Games played 63
1 Goals 3
11 Assists 9
12 Points 12
0.24 Points per game 0.19
-17 Plus/minus -22
32 Shots 77
3.1 Shooting % 3.9
34 Hits 46
57 Penalty minutes 19
19:15 Average ice time 21:47
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
43.6 Corsi for % 43.4
-1.4 CF% relative to team -0.4
44.7 Fenwick for % 43.0
41.9 Expected goals for % 43.8
-6.3 xGF% relative to team -2.1
35.7 Goals for % 33.8
97.4 PDO 97.5
59 Shot attempts taken 125
Expected goals, all situations
2.1 Expected goals 4.1
0.13 Expected goals per 60 0.18
4.4% Chance per attempt 3.6%
-1.1 Goals above expected -1.1
Rating, in goals
-2.2 Goals above replacement +0.8
-0.4 Wins above replacement +0.1
-1.9 Even-strength offence -2.9
-1.9 Even-strength defence -1.5
-0.1 Power play -0.8
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.6
-1.5 Penalties +0.9

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean