Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Nate Prosser Kevin Gravel

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Prosser: Goals, 0.05 a game, 49th percentileNate Prosser: Assists, 0.13 a game, 23rd percentileNate Prosser: Points, 0.18 a game, 28th percentileNate Prosser: Shots, 0.51 a game, 1st percentileNate Prosser: Hits, 0.77 a game, 24th percentileNate Prosser: Corsi for %, 45.9%, 8th percentileNate Prosser: CF% rel, -3.5, 14th percentileNate Prosser: On-ice xG %, 50.5%, 56th percentileNate Prosser: Rating, +0.3 goals above replacement, 34th percentileNate Prosser: Chances created, 0.09 xG per 60, 5th percentileNate Prosser: Shot quality, 2.0% a shot, 1st percentileNate Prosser: Finishing, +1.2 goals above expected, 77th percentileKevin Gravel: Goals, 0.02 a game, 18th percentileKevin Gravel: Assists, 0.12 a game, 21st percentileKevin Gravel: Points, 0.14 a game, 16th percentileKevin Gravel: Shots, 1.06 a game, 32nd percentileKevin Gravel: Hits, 1.49 a game, 63rd percentileKevin Gravel: Corsi for %, 54.9%, 96th percentileKevin Gravel: CF% rel, 1.3, 70th percentileKevin Gravel: On-ice xG %, 57.3%, 96th percentileKevin Gravel: Rating, +3.1 goals above replacement, 62nd percentileKevin Gravel: Chances created, 0.17 xG per 60, 45th percentileKevin Gravel: Shot quality, 2.4% a shot, 17th percentileKevin Gravel: Finishing, -1.0 goals above expected, 32nd percentile
02462040Nate Prosser 7Kevin Gravel 7

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Prosser
Kevin Gravel

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Prosser D, PHI 2016-17 Kevin Gravel D, NSH
39 Games played 49
2 Goals 1
5 Assists 6
7 Points 7
0.18 Points per game 0.14
0 Plus/minus 3
20 Shots 52
10.0 Shooting % 1.9
30 Hits 73
12 Penalty minutes 6
12:44 Average ice time 14:09
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.9 Corsi for % 54.9
-3.5 CF% relative to team +1.3
48.7 Fenwick for % 56.7
50.5 Expected goals for % 57.3
-5.1 xGF% relative to team +1.3
50.0 Goals for % 58.3
100.6 PDO 100.5
51 Shot attempts taken 102
Expected goals, all situations
0.8 Expected goals 2.0
0.09 Expected goals per 60 0.17
2.0% Chance per attempt 2.4%
+1.2 Goals above expected -1.0
Rating, in goals
+0.3 Goals above replacement +3.1
+0.0 Wins above replacement +0.5
-1.5 Even-strength offence -2.1
+0.6 Even-strength defence +2.4
+0.0 Power play -0.4
+0.3 Penalty kill +0.3
-0.8 Penalties +0.6
Contract
$625K Cap hit $668K
$89K Cap dollars per point $95K
$765K Worth at the going rate $2.5M
+$140K Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.9M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean