Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Nate Prosser Andrej Sustr

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Prosser: Goals, 0.04 a game, 31st percentileNate Prosser: Assists, 0.11 a game, 17th percentileNate Prosser: Points, 0.15 a game, 18th percentileNate Prosser: Shots, 0.57 a game, 5th percentileNate Prosser: Hits, 0.42 a game, 4th percentileNate Prosser: Corsi for %, 46.4%, 19th percentileNate Prosser: CF% rel, -2.0, 32nd percentileNate Prosser: On-ice xG %, 43.1%, 8th percentileNate Prosser: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 32nd percentileNate Prosser: Chances created, 0.09 xG per 60, 8th percentileNate Prosser: Shot quality, 2.3% a shot, 13th percentileNate Prosser: Finishing, +0.8 goals above expected, 71st percentileAndrej Sustr: Goals, 0.02 a game, 17th percentileAndrej Sustr: Assists, 0.16 a game, 38th percentileAndrej Sustr: Points, 0.19 a game, 28th percentileAndrej Sustr: Shots, 0.91 a game, 20th percentileAndrej Sustr: Hits, 0.60 a game, 13th percentileAndrej Sustr: Corsi for %, 50.6%, 55th percentileAndrej Sustr: CF% rel, -1.8, 34th percentileAndrej Sustr: On-ice xG %, 48.1%, 32nd percentileAndrej Sustr: Rating, -2.0 goals above replacement, 10th percentileAndrej Sustr: Chances created, 0.10 xG per 60, 11th percentileAndrej Sustr: Shot quality, 2.2% a shot, 8th percentileAndrej Sustr: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 50th percentile
024682040Nate Prosser 8Andrej Sustr 8

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Prosser
Andrej Sustr

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Prosser D, PHI 2013-14 Andrej Sustr D, ANA
53 Games played 43
2 Goals 1
6 Assists 7
8 Points 8
0.15 Points per game 0.19
2 Plus/minus 3
30 Shots 39
6.7 Shooting % 2.6
22 Hits 26
58 Penalty minutes 16
14:32 Average ice time 15:48
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.4 Corsi for % 50.6
-2.0 CF% relative to team -1.8
46.2 Fenwick for % 49.4
43.1 Expected goals for % 48.1
-6.9 xGF% relative to team -4.8
52.3 Goals for % 45.7
102.0 PDO 99.1
77 Shot attempts taken 73
Expected goals, all situations
1.2 Expected goals 1.1
0.09 Expected goals per 60 0.10
2.3% Chance per attempt 2.2%
+0.8 Goals above expected -0.1
Rating, in goals
+0.1 Goals above replacement -2.0
+0.0 Wins above replacement -0.3
-3.0 Even-strength offence -2.3
+1.0 Even-strength defence -1.3
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.4 Penalty kill +0.3
-0.8 Penalties -0.9
Contract
$825K Cap hit $925K
$103K Cap dollars per point $116K
$606K Worth at the going rate -$600K
-$219K Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean