Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Nate Prosser Chris Bigras

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Prosser: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileNate Prosser: Assists, 0.06 a game, 6th percentileNate Prosser: Points, 0.06 a game, 4th percentileNate Prosser: Shots, 0.37 a game, 1st percentileNate Prosser: Hits, 0.63 a game, 14th percentileNate Prosser: Corsi for %, 45.3%, 10th percentileNate Prosser: CF% rel, -3.9, 12th percentileNate Prosser: On-ice xG %, 48.5%, 36th percentileNate Prosser: Rating, -0.2 goals above replacement, 27th percentileNate Prosser: Chances created, 0.06 xG per 60, 1st percentileNate Prosser: Shot quality, 2.1% a shot, 3rd percentileNate Prosser: Finishing, -0.6 goals above expected, 40th percentileChris Bigras: Goals, 0.03 a game, 34th percentileChris Bigras: Assists, 0.06 a game, 7th percentileChris Bigras: Points, 0.10 a game, 8th percentileChris Bigras: Shots, 0.68 a game, 10th percentileChris Bigras: Hits, 0.55 a game, 11th percentileChris Bigras: Corsi for %, 42.7%, 1st percentileChris Bigras: CF% rel, -2.2, 30th percentileChris Bigras: On-ice xG %, 43.7%, 4th percentileChris Bigras: Rating, -1.3 goals above replacement, 17th percentileChris Bigras: Chances created, 0.23 xG per 60, 68th percentileChris Bigras: Shot quality, 4.5% a shot, 95th percentileChris Bigras: Finishing, -0.6 goals above expected, 40th percentile
01232040Nate Prosser 3Chris Bigras 3

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Prosser
Chris Bigras

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Prosser D, PHI 2015-16 Chris Bigras D, COL
54 Games played 31
0 Goals 1
3 Assists 2
3 Points 3
0.06 Points per game 0.10
1 Plus/minus -2
20 Shots 21
0.0 Shooting % 4.8
34 Hits 17
39 Penalty minutes 16
11:23 Average ice time 13:21
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.3 Corsi for % 42.7
-3.9 CF% relative to team -2.2
47.7 Fenwick for % 42.4
48.5 Expected goals for % 43.7
-1.8 xGF% relative to team +0.6
46.2 Goals for % 40.0
98.9 PDO 99.8
42 Shot attempts taken 44
Expected goals, all situations
0.6 Expected goals 1.6
0.06 Expected goals per 60 0.23
2.1% Chance per attempt 4.5%
-0.6 Goals above expected -0.6
Rating, in goals
-0.2 Goals above replacement -1.3
0.0 Wins above replacement -0.2
-2.4 Even-strength offence -0.5
+1.2 Even-strength defence -1.0
0.0 Power play 0.0
-0.1 Penalty kill 0.0
-0.9 Penalties -1.1
Contract
$625K Cap hit $843K
$208K Cap dollars per point $281K
$445K Worth at the going rate -$240K
-$180K Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean