Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Cam Talbot Dan Ellis

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerCam Talbot: Save %, 0.941, 98th percentileCam Talbot: Goals against, 1.57 a game, 98th percentileCam Talbot: Workload, 26.7 shots a game, 37th percentileCam Talbot: Games, 21 games, 9th percentileCam Talbot: Goals saved, +0.77 above expected per 60, 98th percentileDan Ellis: Save %, 0.879, 1st percentileDan Ellis: Goals against, 3.10 a game, 2nd percentileDan Ellis: Workload, 25.7 shots a game, 22nd percentileDan Ellis: Games, 20 games, 6th percentileDan Ellis: Goals saved, -0.64 above expected per 60, 1st percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 65 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Cam Talbot G, CBJ 2013-14 Dan Ellis G, FLA
21 Games played 20
12 Wins 5
6 Losses 11
3 Shutouts 1
560 Shots against 514
527 Saves 452
33 Goals against 62
0.941 Save % 0.879
1.64 Goals against average 3.62
Expected goals, while he was in net
48.6 Expected goals against 51.0
+15.6 Goals saved above expected -11.0
+0.77 Saved above expected per 60 -0.64
6.2% Chance per attempt faced 6.9%
Rating, in goals
+20.6 Goals above replacement -5.8
+3.4 Wins above replacement -1.0
Contract
$563K Cap hit $900K
$4.7M Worth at the going rate -$623K
+$4.1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean