Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Cam Talbot Corey Crawford

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerCam Talbot: Save %, 0.917, 52nd percentileCam Talbot: Goals against, 2.45 a game, 40th percentileCam Talbot: Workload, 29.4 shots a game, 82nd percentileCam Talbot: Games, 56 games, 76th percentileCam Talbot: Goals saved, +0.06 above expected per 60, 60th percentileCorey Crawford: Save %, 0.924, 90th percentileCorey Crawford: Goals against, 2.26 a game, 63rd percentileCorey Crawford: Workload, 29.6 shots a game, 84th percentileCorey Crawford: Games, 58 games, 79th percentileCorey Crawford: Goals saved, +0.32 above expected per 60, 88th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Cam Talbot G, CBJ 2015-16 Corey Crawford G, CHI
56 Games played 58
21 Wins 35
27 Losses 18
3 Shutouts 7
1,648 Shots against 1,718
1,511 Saves 1,587
137 Goals against 131
0.917 Save % 0.924
2.55 Goals against average 2.37
Expected goals, while he was in net
140.3 Expected goals against 148.9
+3.3 Goals saved above expected +17.9
+0.06 Saved above expected per 60 +0.32
6.2% Chance per attempt faced 6.5%
Rating, in goals
+17.6 Goals above replacement +33.0
+2.9 Wins above replacement +5.5
Contract
$1.45M Cap hit $6M
$4.8M Worth at the going rate $8.5M
+$3.3M Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean