Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Cam Talbot Frederik Andersen

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerCam Talbot: Save %, 0.919, 69th percentileCam Talbot: Goals against, 2.34 a game, 58th percentileCam Talbot: Workload, 29.0 shots a game, 60th percentileCam Talbot: Games, 73 games, 98th percentileCam Talbot: Goals saved, +0.37 above expected per 60, 85th percentileFrederik Andersen: Save %, 0.918, 64th percentileFrederik Andersen: Goals against, 2.56 a game, 29th percentileFrederik Andersen: Workload, 31.1 shots a game, 87th percentileFrederik Andersen: Games, 66 games, 96th percentileFrederik Andersen: Goals saved, +0.27 above expected per 60, 80th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Cam Talbot G, CBJ 2016-17 Frederik Andersen G, CAR
73 Games played 66
42 Wins 33
22 Losses 16
7 Shutouts 4
2,117 Shots against 2,052
1,946 Saves 1,883
171 Goals against 169
0.919 Save % 0.918
2.39 Goals against average 2.67
Expected goals, while he was in net
197.3 Expected goals against 186.1
+26.3 Goals saved above expected +17.1
+0.37 Saved above expected per 60 +0.27
6.8% Chance per attempt faced 6.4%
Rating, in goals
+46.4 Goals above replacement +36.0
+7.7 Wins above replacement +6.0
Contract
$4.167M Cap hit $5M
$10.6M Worth at the going rate $8.4M
+$6.5M Value: worth minus cap hit +$3.4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean