Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Cam Talbot Connor Hellebuyck

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerCam Talbot: Save %, 0.908, 28th percentileCam Talbot: Goals against, 2.81 a game, 22nd percentileCam Talbot: Workload, 30.4 shots a game, 65th percentileCam Talbot: Games, 67 games, 97th percentileCam Talbot: Goals saved, +0.01 above expected per 60, 50th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Save %, 0.924, 82nd percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Goals against, 2.33 a game, 70th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Workload, 30.6 shots a game, 72nd percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Games, 67 games, 97th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Goals saved, +0.21 above expected per 60, 72nd percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 60 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Cam Talbot G, CBJ 2017-18 Connor Hellebuyck G, WPG
67 Games played 67
31 Wins 44
31 Losses 11
1 Shutouts 6
2,036 Shots against 2,048
1,848 Saves 1,892
188 Goals against 156
0.908 Save % 0.924
3.02 Goals against average 2.36
Expected goals, while he was in net
188.7 Expected goals against 170.1
+0.7 Goals saved above expected +14.1
+0.01 Saved above expected per 60 +0.21
6.8% Chance per attempt faced 6.0%
Rating, in goals
+20.0 Goals above replacement +31.4
+3.3 Wins above replacement +5.2
Contract
$4.167M Cap hit $2.25M
$5.1M Worth at the going rate $7.7M
+$977K Value: worth minus cap hit +$5.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean