Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Eddie Lack Mike Smith

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerEddie Lack: Save %, 0.901, 6th percentileEddie Lack: Goals against, 2.65 a game, 11th percentileEddie Lack: Workload, 26.8 shots a game, 34th percentileEddie Lack: Games, 34 games, 42nd percentileEddie Lack: Goals saved, -0.10 above expected per 60, 32nd percentileMike Smith: Save %, 0.916, 50th percentileMike Smith: Goals against, 2.41 a game, 48th percentileMike Smith: Workload, 28.8 shots a game, 73rd percentileMike Smith: Games, 32 games, 35th percentileMike Smith: Goals saved, 0.00 above expected per 60, 47th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Eddie Lack G, NJD 2015-16 Mike Smith G, EDM
34 Games played 32
12 Wins 15
14 Losses 13
2 Shutouts 3
910 Shots against 921
820 Saves 844
90 Goals against 77
0.901 Save % 0.916
2.81 Goals against average 2.63
Expected goals, while he was in net
86.8 Expected goals against 77.0
-3.2 Goals saved above expected 0.0
-0.10 Saved above expected per 60 0.00
6.6% Chance per attempt faced 5.8%
Rating, in goals
+5.7 Goals above replacement +7.8
+0.9 Wins above replacement +1.3
Contract
$1.15M Cap hit $5.667M
$1.9M Worth at the going rate $2.4M
+$778K Value: worth minus cap hit -$3.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean