Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Eddie Lack Brian Elliott

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerEddie Lack: Save %, 0.921, 74th percentileEddie Lack: Goals against, 2.32 a game, 48th percentileEddie Lack: Workload, 29.3 shots a game, 72nd percentileEddie Lack: Games, 41 games, 44th percentileEddie Lack: Goals saved, +0.37 above expected per 60, 92nd percentileBrian Elliott: Save %, 0.917, 57th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals against, 2.09 a game, 91st percentileBrian Elliott: Workload, 25.0 shots a game, 13th percentileBrian Elliott: Games, 46 games, 48th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals saved, -0.08 above expected per 60, 31st percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 54 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Eddie Lack G, NJD 2014-15 Brian Elliott G, TBL
41 Games played 46
18 Wins 26
13 Losses 14
2 Shutouts 5
1,201 Shots against 1,150
1,106 Saves 1,054
95 Goals against 96
0.921 Save % 0.917
2.45 Goals against average 2.26
Expected goals, while he was in net
109.4 Expected goals against 92.5
+14.4 Goals saved above expected -3.5
+0.37 Saved above expected per 60 -0.08
6.8% Chance per attempt faced 5.7%
Rating, in goals
+25.6 Goals above replacement +5.9
+4.3 Wins above replacement +1.0
Contract
$1.15M Cap hit $2.5M
$6.1M Worth at the going rate $1.8M
+$5M Value: worth minus cap hit -$652K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean