Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Matt Fraser Dennis Everberg

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMatt Fraser: Goals, 0.13 a game, 38th percentileMatt Fraser: Assists, 0.07 a game, 6th percentileMatt Fraser: Points, 0.20 a game, 18th percentileMatt Fraser: Shots, 1.53 a game, 42nd percentileMatt Fraser: Hits, 1.85 a game, 75th percentileMatt Fraser: Corsi for %, 45.7%, 18th percentileMatt Fraser: CF% rel, -3.3, 18th percentileMatt Fraser: On-ice xG %, 39.5%, 3rd percentileMatt Fraser: Rating, -1.9 goals above replacement, 8th percentileMatt Fraser: Chances created, 0.54 xG per 60, 21st percentileMatt Fraser: Shot quality, 5.3% a shot, 1st percentileMatt Fraser: Finishing, +1.0 goals above expected, 64th percentileDennis Everberg: Goals, 0.05 a game, 10th percentileDennis Everberg: Assists, 0.16 a game, 34th percentileDennis Everberg: Points, 0.22 a game, 22nd percentileDennis Everberg: Shots, 1.13 a game, 20th percentileDennis Everberg: Hits, 1.33 a game, 55th percentileDennis Everberg: Corsi for %, 40.1%, 3rd percentileDennis Everberg: CF% rel, -3.4, 17th percentileDennis Everberg: On-ice xG %, 42.3%, 8th percentileDennis Everberg: Rating, +3.1 goals above replacement, 51st percentileDennis Everberg: Chances created, 0.54 xG per 60, 21st percentileDennis Everberg: Shot quality, 6.9% a shot, 34th percentileDennis Everberg: Finishing, -3.9 goals above expected, 13th percentile
0510204060Matt Fraser 12Dennis Everberg 12

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Matt Fraser
Dennis Everberg

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Matt Fraser R, EDM 2014-15 Dennis Everberg R, COL
60 Games played 55
8 Goals 3
4 Assists 9
12 Points 12
0.20 Points per game 0.22
-16 Plus/minus -7
92 Shots 62
8.7 Shooting % 4.8
111 Hits 73
17 Penalty minutes 10
11:13 Average ice time 11:48
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.7 Corsi for % 40.1
-3.3 CF% relative to team -3.4
45.5 Fenwick for % 41.1
39.5 Expected goals for % 42.3
-7.1 xGF% relative to team -0.9
34.0 Goals for % 37.5
96.5 PDO 98.5
122 Shot attempts taken 101
Expected goals, all situations
6.0 Expected goals 5.9
0.54 Expected goals per 60 0.54
5.3% Chance per attempt 6.9%
+1.0 Goals above expected -3.9
Rating, in goals
-1.9 Goals above replacement +3.1
-0.3 Wins above replacement +0.5
-3.7 Even-strength offence -1.5
-0.9 Even-strength defence +1.4
-0.1 Power play -0.1
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.2
+1.1 Penalties +1.4
Contract
$625K Cap hit $612K
$52K Cap dollars per point $51K
-$564K Worth at the going rate $2.4M
-$1.2M Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.8M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean