Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Chris Tanev John Erskine

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerChris Tanev: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileChris Tanev: Assists, 0.08 a game, 11th percentileChris Tanev: Points, 0.08 a game, 6th percentileChris Tanev: Shots, 0.60 a game, 7th percentileChris Tanev: Hits, 0.40 a game, 5th percentileChris Tanev: Corsi for %, 54.9%, 93rd percentileChris Tanev: CF% rel, 2.9, 81st percentileChris Tanev: On-ice xG %, 55.0%, 93rd percentileChris Tanev: Rating, +3.6 goals above replacement, 67th percentileChris Tanev: Chances created, 0.06 xG per 60, 3rd percentileChris Tanev: Shot quality, 2.2% a shot, 5th percentileChris Tanev: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 51st percentileJohn Erskine: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileJohn Erskine: Assists, 0.07 a game, 8th percentileJohn Erskine: Points, 0.07 a game, 5th percentileJohn Erskine: Shots, 0.71 a game, 16th percentileJohn Erskine: Hits, 1.39 a game, 57th percentileJohn Erskine: Corsi for %, 48.1%, 35th percentileJohn Erskine: CF% rel, -0.3, 50th percentileJohn Erskine: On-ice xG %, 48.5%, 40th percentileJohn Erskine: Rating, -1.4 goals above replacement, 15th percentileJohn Erskine: Chances created, 0.08 xG per 60, 9th percentileJohn Erskine: Shot quality, 1.7% a shot, 1st percentileJohn Erskine: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 51st percentile
00.511.5220Chris Tanev 2John Erskine 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Chris Tanev
John Erskine

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Chris Tanev D, TOR 2011-12 John Erskine D, WSH
25 Games played 28
0 Goals 0
2 Assists 2
2 Points 2
0.08 Points per game 0.07
10 Plus/minus 3
15 Shots 20
0.0 Shooting % 0.0
10 Hits 39
2 Penalty minutes 51
16:43 Average ice time 12:06
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
54.9 Corsi for % 48.1
+2.9 CF% relative to team -0.3
55.4 Fenwick for % 47.2
55.0 Expected goals for % 48.5
+10.3 xGF% relative to team +0.6
66.7 Goals for % 55.0
102.8 PDO 102.3
40 Shot attempts taken 41
Expected goals, all situations
0.5 Expected goals 0.5
0.06 Expected goals per 60 0.08
2.2% Chance per attempt 1.7%
-0.5 Goals above expected -0.5
Rating, in goals
+3.6 Goals above replacement -1.4
+0.6 Wins above replacement -0.2
-0.8 Even-strength offence -1.0
+2.5 Even-strength defence +0.4
0.0 Power play 0.0
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.2
+0.6 Penalties -2.1

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean