Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Chris Tanev Mark Borowiecki

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerChris Tanev: Goals, 0.05 a game, 37th percentileChris Tanev: Assists, 0.21 a game, 54th percentileChris Tanev: Points, 0.26 a game, 50th percentileChris Tanev: Shots, 0.74 a game, 6th percentileChris Tanev: Hits, 0.50 a game, 9th percentileChris Tanev: Corsi for %, 47.9%, 25th percentileChris Tanev: CF% rel, -0.9, 38th percentileChris Tanev: On-ice xG %, 45.6%, 13th percentileChris Tanev: Rating, +2.5 goals above replacement, 55th percentileChris Tanev: Chances created, 0.07 xG per 60, 1st percentileChris Tanev: Shot quality, 2.3% a shot, 14th percentileChris Tanev: Finishing, +1.1 goals above expected, 64th percentileMark Borowiecki: Goals, 0.06 a game, 47th percentileMark Borowiecki: Assists, 0.15 a game, 32nd percentileMark Borowiecki: Points, 0.21 a game, 35th percentileMark Borowiecki: Shots, 1.27 a game, 43rd percentileMark Borowiecki: Hits, 4.35 a game, 99th percentileMark Borowiecki: Corsi for %, 46.5%, 14th percentileMark Borowiecki: CF% rel, 0.5, 55th percentileMark Borowiecki: On-ice xG %, 48.7%, 39th percentileMark Borowiecki: Rating, +5.4 goals above replacement, 78th percentileMark Borowiecki: Chances created, 0.25 xG per 60, 73rd percentileMark Borowiecki: Shot quality, 3.2% a shot, 58th percentileMark Borowiecki: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 45th percentile
05102040Chris Tanev 11Mark Borowiecki 11

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Chris Tanev
Mark Borowiecki

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Chris Tanev D, TOR 2017-18 Mark Borowiecki D, NSH
42 Games played 52
2 Goals 3
9 Assists 8
11 Points 11
0.26 Points per game 0.21
7 Plus/minus -6
31 Shots 66
6.5 Shooting % 4.5
21 Hits 226
8 Penalty minutes 64
19:47 Average ice time 14:39
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.9 Corsi for % 46.5
-0.9 CF% relative to team +0.5
47.0 Fenwick for % 48.9
45.6 Expected goals for % 48.7
-0.6 xGF% relative to team +5.4
50.8 Goals for % 44.1
101.2 PDO 98.3
45 Shot attempts taken 128
Expected goals, all situations
0.9 Expected goals 3.1
0.07 Expected goals per 60 0.25
2.3% Chance per attempt 3.2%
+1.1 Goals above expected -0.1
Rating, in goals
+2.5 Goals above replacement +5.4
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.9
-1.9 Even-strength offence +0.9
+0.9 Even-strength defence +2.0
-0.1 Power play 0.0
+0.8 Penalty kill +0.4
+0.1 Penalties -0.4
Contract
$4.45M Cap hit $1.1M
$405K Cap dollars per point $100K
$2.2M Worth at the going rate $4.1M
-$2.3M Value: worth minus cap hit +$3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean