Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Chris Tanev Stephen Johns

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerChris Tanev: Goals, 0.04 a game, 31st percentileChris Tanev: Assists, 0.15 a game, 33rd percentileChris Tanev: Points, 0.19 a game, 31st percentileChris Tanev: Shots, 0.74 a game, 8th percentileChris Tanev: Hits, 0.36 a game, 3rd percentileChris Tanev: Corsi for %, 47.8%, 25th percentileChris Tanev: CF% rel, 0.3, 55th percentileChris Tanev: On-ice xG %, 44.7%, 11th percentileChris Tanev: Rating, +3.6 goals above replacement, 66th percentileChris Tanev: Chances created, 0.10 xG per 60, 5th percentileChris Tanev: Shot quality, 2.7% a shot, 30th percentileChris Tanev: Finishing, +0.3 goals above expected, 62nd percentileStephen Johns: Goals, 0.07 a game, 62nd percentileStephen Johns: Assists, 0.10 a game, 13th percentileStephen Johns: Points, 0.16 a game, 23rd percentileStephen Johns: Shots, 1.49 a game, 64th percentileStephen Johns: Hits, 2.61 a game, 94th percentileStephen Johns: Corsi for %, 51.2%, 68th percentileStephen Johns: CF% rel, 0.8, 64th percentileStephen Johns: On-ice xG %, 52.6%, 77th percentileStephen Johns: Rating, +6.9 goals above replacement, 83rd percentileStephen Johns: Chances created, 0.18 xG per 60, 49th percentileStephen Johns: Shot quality, 2.4% a shot, 18th percentileStephen Johns: Finishing, +0.6 goals above expected, 70th percentile
0246810204060Chris Tanev 10Stephen Johns 10

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Chris Tanev
Stephen Johns

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Chris Tanev D, TOR 2016-17 Stephen Johns D, DAL
53 Games played 61
2 Goals 4
8 Assists 6
10 Points 10
0.19 Points per game 0.16
3 Plus/minus -10
39 Shots 91
5.1 Shooting % 4.4
19 Hits 159
14 Penalty minutes 36
20:21 Average ice time 18:15
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.8 Corsi for % 51.2
+0.3 CF% relative to team +0.8
46.2 Fenwick for % 53.0
44.7 Expected goals for % 52.6
+0.5 xGF% relative to team +4.8
50.9 Goals for % 44.6
101.2 PDO 97.2
82 Shot attempts taken 191
Expected goals, all situations
1.7 Expected goals 3.4
0.10 Expected goals per 60 0.18
2.7% Chance per attempt 2.4%
+0.3 Goals above expected +0.6
Rating, in goals
+3.6 Goals above replacement +6.9
+0.6 Wins above replacement +1.1
-3.5 Even-strength offence -1.7
+4.1 Even-strength defence +5.9
-0.4 Power play +0.1
-0.1 Penalty kill -0.3
-0.1 Penalties -0.7
Contract
$4.45M Cap hit $725K
$445K Cap dollars per point $73K
$2.8M Worth at the going rate $5M
-$1.6M Value: worth minus cap hit +$4.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean