Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Chris Tanev Andreas Borgman

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerChris Tanev: Goals, 0.05 a game, 37th percentileChris Tanev: Assists, 0.21 a game, 54th percentileChris Tanev: Points, 0.26 a game, 50th percentileChris Tanev: Shots, 0.74 a game, 6th percentileChris Tanev: Hits, 0.50 a game, 9th percentileChris Tanev: Corsi for %, 47.9%, 25th percentileChris Tanev: CF% rel, -0.9, 38th percentileChris Tanev: On-ice xG %, 45.6%, 13th percentileChris Tanev: Rating, +2.5 goals above replacement, 55th percentileChris Tanev: Chances created, 0.07 xG per 60, 1st percentileChris Tanev: Shot quality, 2.3% a shot, 14th percentileChris Tanev: Finishing, +1.1 goals above expected, 64th percentileAndreas Borgman: Goals, 0.06 a game, 50th percentileAndreas Borgman: Assists, 0.17 a game, 37th percentileAndreas Borgman: Points, 0.23 a game, 41st percentileAndreas Borgman: Shots, 0.96 a game, 18th percentileAndreas Borgman: Hits, 2.52 a game, 92nd percentileAndreas Borgman: Corsi for %, 50.2%, 55th percentileAndreas Borgman: CF% rel, 0.5, 54th percentileAndreas Borgman: On-ice xG %, 51.4%, 64th percentileAndreas Borgman: Rating, +1.1 goals above replacement, 40th percentileAndreas Borgman: Chances created, 0.18 xG per 60, 36th percentileAndreas Borgman: Shot quality, 2.7% a shot, 33rd percentileAndreas Borgman: Finishing, +1.1 goals above expected, 63rd percentile
05102040Chris Tanev 11Andreas Borgman 11

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Chris Tanev
Andreas Borgman

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Chris Tanev D, TOR 2017-18 Andreas Borgman D, TBL
42 Games played 48
2 Goals 3
9 Assists 8
11 Points 11
0.26 Points per game 0.23
7 Plus/minus 4
31 Shots 46
6.5 Shooting % 6.5
21 Hits 121
8 Penalty minutes 28
19:47 Average ice time 13:41
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.9 Corsi for % 50.2
-0.9 CF% relative to team +0.5
47.0 Fenwick for % 48.4
45.6 Expected goals for % 51.4
-0.6 xGF% relative to team +0.5
50.8 Goals for % 53.2
101.2 PDO 102.2
45 Shot attempts taken 113
Expected goals, all situations
0.9 Expected goals 1.9
0.07 Expected goals per 60 0.18
2.3% Chance per attempt 2.7%
+1.1 Goals above expected +1.1
Rating, in goals
+2.5 Goals above replacement +1.1
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.2
-1.9 Even-strength offence -0.7
+0.9 Even-strength defence +0.8
-0.1 Power play 0.0
+0.8 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.1 Penalties -1.3
Contract
$4.45M Cap hit $925K
$405K Cap dollars per point $84K
$2.2M Worth at the going rate $1.3M
-$2.3M Value: worth minus cap hit +$405K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean