Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Stephen Johns Nate Prosser

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerStephen Johns: Goals, 0.07 a game, 63rd percentileStephen Johns: Assists, 0.14 a game, 34th percentileStephen Johns: Points, 0.21 a game, 42nd percentileStephen Johns: Shots, 0.93 a game, 29th percentileStephen Johns: Hits, 3.93 a game, 99th percentileStephen Johns: Corsi for %, 49.0%, 37th percentileStephen Johns: CF% rel, 0.0, 53rd percentileStephen Johns: On-ice xG %, 48.3%, 34th percentileStephen Johns: Rating, +0.7 goals above replacement, 37th percentileStephen Johns: Chances created, 0.15 xG per 60, 33rd percentileStephen Johns: Shot quality, 2.7% a shot, 29th percentileStephen Johns: Finishing, +0.4 goals above expected, 63rd percentileNate Prosser: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileNate Prosser: Assists, 0.06 a game, 6th percentileNate Prosser: Points, 0.06 a game, 4th percentileNate Prosser: Shots, 0.37 a game, 1st percentileNate Prosser: Hits, 0.63 a game, 14th percentileNate Prosser: Corsi for %, 45.3%, 10th percentileNate Prosser: CF% rel, -3.9, 12th percentileNate Prosser: On-ice xG %, 48.5%, 36th percentileNate Prosser: Rating, -0.2 goals above replacement, 27th percentileNate Prosser: Chances created, 0.06 xG per 60, 1st percentileNate Prosser: Shot quality, 2.1% a shot, 3rd percentileNate Prosser: Finishing, -0.6 goals above expected, 40th percentile
01232040Stephen Johns 3Nate Prosser 3

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Stephen Johns
Nate Prosser

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Stephen Johns D, DAL 2015-16 Nate Prosser D, PHI
14 Games played 54
1 Goals 0
2 Assists 3
3 Points 3
0.21 Points per game 0.06
-6 Plus/minus 1
13 Shots 20
7.7 Shooting % 0.0
55 Hits 34
6 Penalty minutes 39
17:50 Average ice time 11:23
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.0 Corsi for % 45.3
0.0 CF% relative to team -3.9
49.8 Fenwick for % 47.7
48.3 Expected goals for % 48.5
-3.3 xGF% relative to team -1.8
33.3 Goals for % 46.2
95.5 PDO 98.9
28 Shot attempts taken 42
Expected goals, all situations
0.6 Expected goals 0.6
0.15 Expected goals per 60 0.06
2.7% Chance per attempt 2.1%
+0.4 Goals above expected -0.6
Rating, in goals
+0.7 Goals above replacement -0.2
+0.1 Wins above replacement 0.0
-0.9 Even-strength offence -2.4
+0.8 Even-strength defence +1.2
-0.1 Power play 0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill -0.1
+0.0 Penalties -0.9

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean