Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Brandon Gormley Seth Helgeson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerBrandon Gormley: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileBrandon Gormley: Assists, 0.04 a game, 4th percentileBrandon Gormley: Points, 0.04 a game, 2nd percentileBrandon Gormley: Shots, 0.42 a game, 2nd percentileBrandon Gormley: Hits, 0.69 a game, 18th percentileBrandon Gormley: Corsi for %, 45.8%, 13th percentileBrandon Gormley: CF% rel, 1.4, 71st percentileBrandon Gormley: On-ice xG %, 45.7%, 15th percentileBrandon Gormley: Rating, -0.1 goals above replacement, 28th percentileBrandon Gormley: Chances created, 0.09 xG per 60, 8th percentileBrandon Gormley: Shot quality, 2.2% a shot, 5th percentileBrandon Gormley: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 44th percentileSeth Helgeson: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileSeth Helgeson: Assists, 0.05 a game, 6th percentileSeth Helgeson: Points, 0.05 a game, 4th percentileSeth Helgeson: Shots, 0.47 a game, 3rd percentileSeth Helgeson: Hits, 2.42 a game, 92nd percentileSeth Helgeson: Corsi for %, 41.6%, 1st percentileSeth Helgeson: CF% rel, -2.7, 26th percentileSeth Helgeson: On-ice xG %, 42.2%, 2nd percentileSeth Helgeson: Rating, -1.1 goals above replacement, 19th percentileSeth Helgeson: Chances created, 0.09 xG per 60, 10th percentileSeth Helgeson: Shot quality, 2.3% a shot, 9th percentileSeth Helgeson: Finishing, -0.4 goals above expected, 45th percentile
00.20.40.60.8120Brandon Gormley 1Seth Helgeson 1

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Brandon Gormley
Seth Helgeson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Brandon Gormley D, COL 2015-16 Seth Helgeson D, NJD
26 Games played 19
0 Goals 0
1 Assists 1
1 Points 1
0.04 Points per game 0.05
-3 Plus/minus -5
11 Shots 9
0.0 Shooting % 0.0
18 Hits 46
8 Penalty minutes 17
12:11 Average ice time 13:57
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.8 Corsi for % 41.6
+1.4 CF% relative to team -2.7
46.8 Fenwick for % 42.7
45.7 Expected goals for % 42.2
+1.0 xGF% relative to team -3.8
44.8 Goals for % 22.2
98.6 PDO 96.7
32 Shot attempts taken 20
Expected goals, all situations
0.5 Expected goals 0.4
0.09 Expected goals per 60 0.09
2.2% Chance per attempt 2.3%
-0.5 Goals above expected -0.4
Rating, in goals
-0.1 Goals above replacement -1.1
0.0 Wins above replacement -0.2
-1.1 Even-strength offence -0.6
+0.5 Even-strength defence -0.8
0.0 Power play 0.0
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.1
-0.5 Penalties -0.6
Contract
$850K Cap hit $588K
$850K Cap dollars per point $588K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean