Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Kevin Hayes Sam Bennett

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerKevin Hayes: Goals, 0.18 a game, 57th percentileKevin Hayes: Assists, 0.28 a game, 62nd percentileKevin Hayes: Points, 0.46 a game, 58th percentileKevin Hayes: Shots, 1.68 a game, 53rd percentileKevin Hayes: Hits, 0.75 a game, 31st percentileKevin Hayes: Corsi for %, 48.9%, 37th percentileKevin Hayes: CF% rel, 2.4, 72nd percentileKevin Hayes: On-ice xG %, 48.8%, 39th percentileKevin Hayes: Rating, +3.5 goals above replacement, 57th percentileKevin Hayes: Chances created, 0.66 xG per 60, 43rd percentileKevin Hayes: Shot quality, 6.3% a shot, 16th percentileKevin Hayes: Finishing, +2.1 goals above expected, 74th percentileSam Bennett: Goals, 0.23 a game, 71st percentileSam Bennett: Assists, 0.23 a game, 52nd percentileSam Bennett: Points, 0.47 a game, 59th percentileSam Bennett: Shots, 1.77 a game, 58th percentileSam Bennett: Hits, 1.43 a game, 65th percentileSam Bennett: Corsi for %, 48.7%, 35th percentileSam Bennett: CF% rel, 0.8, 54th percentileSam Bennett: On-ice xG %, 49.4%, 45th percentileSam Bennett: Rating, +6.4 goals above replacement, 74th percentileSam Bennett: Chances created, 0.83 xG per 60, 73rd percentileSam Bennett: Shot quality, 9.1% a shot, 89th percentileSam Bennett: Finishing, +0.8 goals above expected, 65th percentile
0102030204060Kevin Hayes 36Sam Bennett 36

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Kevin Hayes
Sam Bennett

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Kevin Hayes R, PIT 2015-16 Sam Bennett C, FLA
79 Games played 77
14 Goals 18
22 Assists 18
36 Points 36
0.46 Points per game 0.47
4 Plus/minus -11
133 Shots 136
10.5 Shooting % 13.2
59 Hits 110
30 Penalty minutes 37
13:40 Average ice time 15:09
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.9 Corsi for % 48.7
+2.4 CF% relative to team +0.8
49.4 Fenwick for % 47.9
48.8 Expected goals for % 49.4
+2.3 xGF% relative to team +0.3
59.4 Goals for % 49.4
103.0 PDO 100.3
205 Shot attempts taken 195
Expected goals, all situations
11.9 Expected goals 16.2
0.66 Expected goals per 60 0.83
6.3% Chance per attempt 9.1%
+2.1 Goals above expected +0.8
Rating, in goals
+3.5 Goals above replacement +6.4
+0.6 Wins above replacement +1.1
+2.3 Even-strength offence +1.5
-1.6 Even-strength defence -0.1
+0.0 Power play -0.4
-0.1 Penalty kill -0.2
-0.2 Penalties +2.3
Contract
$900K Cap hit $925K
$25K Cap dollars per point $26K
$2.8M Worth at the going rate $4.6M
+$1.9M Value: worth minus cap hit +$3.7M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean