Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Jaden Schwartz Riley Nash

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJaden Schwartz: Goals, 0.24 a game, 72nd percentileJaden Schwartz: Assists, 0.42 a game, 86th percentileJaden Schwartz: Points, 0.67 a game, 82nd percentileJaden Schwartz: Shots, 1.91 a game, 65th percentileJaden Schwartz: Hits, 0.79 a game, 32nd percentileJaden Schwartz: Corsi for %, 53.9%, 86th percentileJaden Schwartz: CF% rel, -0.7, 38th percentileJaden Schwartz: On-ice xG %, 56.7%, 94th percentileJaden Schwartz: Rating, +2.9 goals above replacement, 52nd percentileJaden Schwartz: Chances created, 0.71 xG per 60, 51st percentileJaden Schwartz: Shot quality, 8.1% a shot, 70th percentileJaden Schwartz: Finishing, +0.2 goals above expected, 58th percentileRiley Nash: Goals, 0.14 a game, 42nd percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.20 a game, 47th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.34 a game, 44th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.19 a game, 26th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 0.91 a game, 39th percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 52.0%, 71st percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, -0.4, 42nd percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 52.0%, 65th percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +4.2 goals above replacement, 63rd percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.62 xG per 60, 33rd percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 8.9% a shot, 86th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, +0.4 goals above expected, 59th percentile
05101520204060Jaden Schwartz 22Riley Nash 22

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Jaden Schwartz
Riley Nash

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Jaden Schwartz L, COL 2015-16 Riley Nash C, NYR
33 Games played 64
8 Goals 9
14 Assists 13
22 Points 22
0.67 Points per game 0.34
8 Plus/minus -5
63 Shots 76
12.7 Shooting % 11.8
26 Hits 58
8 Penalty minutes 18
17:12 Average ice time 12:57
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.9 Corsi for % 52.0
-0.7 CF% relative to team -0.4
52.9 Fenwick for % 50.6
56.7 Expected goals for % 52.0
+0.4 xGF% relative to team +1.2
60.0 Goals for % 46.5
102.4 PDO 98.7
74 Shot attempts taken 105
Expected goals, all situations
6.8 Expected goals 8.6
0.71 Expected goals per 60 0.62
8.1% Chance per attempt 8.9%
+0.2 Goals above expected +0.4
Rating, in goals
+2.9 Goals above replacement +4.2
+0.5 Wins above replacement +0.7
+0.2 Even-strength offence -0.7
+1.1 Even-strength defence +1.9
+0.0 Power play +0.3
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.1 Penalties +0.4
Contract
$2.35M Cap hit $1.15M
$107K Cap dollars per point $52K
$2.4M Worth at the going rate $3.2M
+$73K Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean