Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Emerson Etem Nathan Gerbe

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerEmerson Etem: Goals, 0.08 a game, 22nd percentileEmerson Etem: Assists, 0.18 a game, 42nd percentileEmerson Etem: Points, 0.26 a game, 31st percentileEmerson Etem: Shots, 1.26 a game, 33rd percentileEmerson Etem: Hits, 1.13 a game, 50th percentileEmerson Etem: Corsi for %, 45.3%, 15th percentileEmerson Etem: CF% rel, -3.4, 21st percentileEmerson Etem: On-ice xG %, 48.5%, 41st percentileEmerson Etem: Rating, +1.8 goals above replacement, 47th percentileEmerson Etem: Chances created, 0.62 xG per 60, 37th percentileEmerson Etem: Shot quality, 6.2% a shot, 16th percentileEmerson Etem: Finishing, -1.5 goals above expected, 30th percentileNathan Gerbe: Goals, 0.12 a game, 36th percentileNathan Gerbe: Assists, 0.12 a game, 24th percentileNathan Gerbe: Points, 0.24 a game, 27th percentileNathan Gerbe: Shots, 1.52 a game, 46th percentileNathan Gerbe: Hits, 0.76 a game, 30th percentileNathan Gerbe: Corsi for %, 41.7%, 4th percentileNathan Gerbe: CF% rel, -4.2, 16th percentileNathan Gerbe: On-ice xG %, 39.4%, 2nd percentileNathan Gerbe: Rating, -1.3 goals above replacement, 9th percentileNathan Gerbe: Chances created, 0.54 xG per 60, 21st percentileNathan Gerbe: Shot quality, 5.6% a shot, 6th percentileNathan Gerbe: Finishing, +0.3 goals above expected, 56th percentile
02468102040Emerson Etem 10Nathan Gerbe 10

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Emerson Etem
Nathan Gerbe

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Emerson Etem R, ANA 2012-13 Nathan Gerbe C, CBJ
38 Games played 42
3 Goals 5
7 Assists 5
10 Points 10
0.26 Points per game 0.24
7 Plus/minus -3
48 Shots 64
6.3 Shooting % 7.8
43 Hits 32
9 Penalty minutes 14
11:28 Average ice time 12:30
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.3 Corsi for % 41.7
-3.4 CF% relative to team -4.2
45.9 Fenwick for % 42.5
48.5 Expected goals for % 39.4
-0.1 xGF% relative to team -5.3
59.1 Goals for % 42.9
103.4 PDO 99.8
81 Shot attempts taken 98
Expected goals, all situations
4.5 Expected goals 4.7
0.62 Expected goals per 60 0.54
6.2% Chance per attempt 5.6%
-1.5 Goals above expected +0.3
Rating, in goals
+1.8 Goals above replacement -1.3
+0.3 Wins above replacement -0.2
-0.2 Even-strength offence -1.7
+0.7 Even-strength defence -0.8
-0.1 Power play -0.5
-0.2 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.4 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$870K Cap hit $1.45M
$87K Cap dollars per point $145K
$2.1M Worth at the going rate -$601K
+$1.2M Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean