Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Emerson Etem Cal Clutterbuck

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerEmerson Etem: Goals, 0.08 a game, 22nd percentileEmerson Etem: Assists, 0.18 a game, 42nd percentileEmerson Etem: Points, 0.26 a game, 31st percentileEmerson Etem: Shots, 1.26 a game, 33rd percentileEmerson Etem: Hits, 1.13 a game, 50th percentileEmerson Etem: Corsi for %, 45.3%, 15th percentileEmerson Etem: CF% rel, -3.4, 21st percentileEmerson Etem: On-ice xG %, 48.5%, 41st percentileEmerson Etem: Rating, +1.8 goals above replacement, 47th percentileEmerson Etem: Chances created, 0.62 xG per 60, 37th percentileEmerson Etem: Shot quality, 6.2% a shot, 16th percentileEmerson Etem: Finishing, -1.5 goals above expected, 30th percentileCal Clutterbuck: Goals, 0.10 a game, 31st percentileCal Clutterbuck: Assists, 0.14 a game, 29th percentileCal Clutterbuck: Points, 0.24 a game, 27th percentileCal Clutterbuck: Shots, 2.07 a game, 70th percentileCal Clutterbuck: Hits, 3.69 a game, 98th percentileCal Clutterbuck: Corsi for %, 48.7%, 38th percentileCal Clutterbuck: CF% rel, -1.5, 36th percentileCal Clutterbuck: On-ice xG %, 50.2%, 53rd percentileCal Clutterbuck: Rating, +2.0 goals above replacement, 50th percentileCal Clutterbuck: Chances created, 0.61 xG per 60, 33rd percentileCal Clutterbuck: Shot quality, 5.1% a shot, 2nd percentileCal Clutterbuck: Finishing, -1.8 goals above expected, 26th percentile
02468102040Emerson Etem 10Cal Clutterbuck 10

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Emerson Etem
Cal Clutterbuck

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Emerson Etem R, ANA 2012-13 Cal Clutterbuck R, NYI
38 Games played 42
3 Goals 4
7 Assists 6
10 Points 10
0.26 Points per game 0.24
7 Plus/minus -5
48 Shots 87
6.3 Shooting % 4.6
43 Hits 155
9 Penalty minutes 27
11:28 Average ice time 13:44
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.3 Corsi for % 48.7
-3.4 CF% relative to team -1.5
45.9 Fenwick for % 49.3
48.5 Expected goals for % 50.2
-0.1 xGF% relative to team -4.1
59.1 Goals for % 36.0
103.4 PDO 96.6
81 Shot attempts taken 125
Expected goals, all situations
4.5 Expected goals 5.8
0.62 Expected goals per 60 0.61
6.2% Chance per attempt 5.1%
-1.5 Goals above expected -1.8
Rating, in goals
+1.8 Goals above replacement +2.0
+0.3 Wins above replacement +0.3
-0.2 Even-strength offence -2.5
+0.7 Even-strength defence +1.6
-0.1 Power play 0.0
-0.2 Penalty kill +0.3
+0.4 Penalties +0.9
Contract
$870K Cap hit $1.4M
$87K Cap dollars per point $140K
$2.1M Worth at the going rate $2.2M
+$1.2M Value: worth minus cap hit +$815K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean