Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Emerson Etem Linden Vey

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerEmerson Etem: Goals, 0.12 a game, 36th percentileEmerson Etem: Assists, 0.14 a game, 31st percentileEmerson Etem: Points, 0.26 a game, 32nd percentileEmerson Etem: Shots, 1.72 a game, 56th percentileEmerson Etem: Hits, 1.50 a game, 67th percentileEmerson Etem: Corsi for %, 45.7%, 13th percentileEmerson Etem: CF% rel, -1.5, 29th percentileEmerson Etem: On-ice xG %, 44.2%, 11th percentileEmerson Etem: Rating, +3.1 goals above replacement, 53rd percentileEmerson Etem: Chances created, 0.76 xG per 60, 58th percentileEmerson Etem: Shot quality, 7.2% a shot, 38th percentileEmerson Etem: Finishing, -3.6 goals above expected, 19th percentileLinden Vey: Goals, 0.10 a game, 27th percentileLinden Vey: Assists, 0.27 a game, 60th percentileLinden Vey: Points, 0.37 a game, 47th percentileLinden Vey: Shots, 0.98 a game, 16th percentileLinden Vey: Hits, 0.10 a game, 1st percentileLinden Vey: Corsi for %, 44.7%, 7th percentileLinden Vey: CF% rel, -2.6, 21st percentileLinden Vey: On-ice xG %, 39.6%, 1st percentileLinden Vey: Rating, -2.8 goals above replacement, 3rd percentileLinden Vey: Chances created, 0.47 xG per 60, 10th percentileLinden Vey: Shot quality, 8.5% a shot, 79th percentileLinden Vey: Finishing, -1.1 goals above expected, 42nd percentile
0510152040Emerson Etem 15Linden Vey 15

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Emerson Etem
Linden Vey

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Emerson Etem R, ANA 2015-16 Linden Vey R, CGY
58 Games played 41
7 Goals 4
8 Assists 11
15 Points 15
0.26 Points per game 0.37
-12 Plus/minus -14
100 Shots 40
7.0 Shooting % 10.0
87 Hits 4
11 Penalty minutes 6
13:09 Average ice time 15:45
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.7 Corsi for % 44.7
-1.5 CF% relative to team -2.6
45.5 Fenwick for % 44.6
44.2 Expected goals for % 39.6
+1.1 xGF% relative to team -5.9
40.7 Goals for % 35.7
98.0 PDO 97.8
172 Shot attempts taken 52
Expected goals, all situations
9.6 Expected goals 5.1
0.76 Expected goals per 60 0.47
7.2% Chance per attempt 8.5%
-3.6 Goals above expected -1.1
Rating, in goals
+3.1 Goals above replacement -2.8
+0.5 Wins above replacement -0.5
+1.1 Even-strength offence -2.0
-1.2 Even-strength defence -2.5
-0.1 Power play -0.4
+0.1 Penalty kill +0.1
+1.1 Penalties +0.2
Contract
$850K Cap hit $1M
$57K Cap dollars per point $67K
$2.5M Worth at the going rate -$1.2M
+$1.7M Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean