Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Emerson Etem Seth Griffith

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerEmerson Etem: Goals, 0.11 a game, 28th percentileEmerson Etem: Assists, 0.11 a game, 20th percentileEmerson Etem: Points, 0.22 a game, 23rd percentileEmerson Etem: Shots, 1.71 a game, 53rd percentileEmerson Etem: Hits, 1.40 a game, 59th percentileEmerson Etem: Corsi for %, 53.6%, 77th percentileEmerson Etem: CF% rel, 2.5, 75th percentileEmerson Etem: On-ice xG %, 53.4%, 71st percentileEmerson Etem: Rating, +2.5 goals above replacement, 46th percentileEmerson Etem: Chances created, 0.80 xG per 60, 66th percentileEmerson Etem: Shot quality, 7.2% a shot, 42nd percentileEmerson Etem: Finishing, -2.3 goals above expected, 31st percentileSeth Griffith: Goals, 0.20 a game, 60th percentileSeth Griffith: Assists, 0.13 a game, 26th percentileSeth Griffith: Points, 0.33 a game, 36th percentileSeth Griffith: Shots, 1.10 a game, 18th percentileSeth Griffith: Hits, 0.47 a game, 12th percentileSeth Griffith: Corsi for %, 49.4%, 38th percentileSeth Griffith: CF% rel, -3.2, 18th percentileSeth Griffith: On-ice xG %, 42.7%, 10th percentileSeth Griffith: Rating, -1.6 goals above replacement, 10th percentileSeth Griffith: Chances created, 0.53 xG per 60, 20th percentileSeth Griffith: Shot quality, 6.8% a shot, 32nd percentileSeth Griffith: Finishing, +2.4 goals above expected, 75th percentile
02468102040Emerson Etem 10Seth Griffith 10

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Emerson Etem
Seth Griffith

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Emerson Etem R, ANA 2014-15 Seth Griffith C, EDM
45 Games played 30
5 Goals 6
5 Assists 4
10 Points 10
0.22 Points per game 0.33
-6 Plus/minus -2
77 Shots 33
6.5 Shooting % 18.2
63 Hits 14
4 Penalty minutes 6
12:15 Average ice time 13:27
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.6 Corsi for % 49.4
+2.5 CF% relative to team -3.2
54.1 Fenwick for % 47.7
53.4 Expected goals for % 42.7
+0.4 xGF% relative to team -11.3
40.6 Goals for % 45.5
96.7 PDO 100.2
130 Shot attempts taken 58
Expected goals, all situations
7.3 Expected goals 3.6
0.80 Expected goals per 60 0.53
7.2% Chance per attempt 6.8%
-2.3 Goals above expected +2.4
Rating, in goals
+2.5 Goals above replacement -1.6
+0.4 Wins above replacement -0.3
+0.5 Even-strength offence -1.5
-0.4 Even-strength defence -0.6
-0.2 Power play -0.5
+0.1 Penalty kill +0.0
+1.1 Penalties -0.1
Contract
$870K Cap hit $759K
$87K Cap dollars per point $76K
$2.1M Worth at the going rate -$428K
+$1.2M Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean