Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Petter Granberg Paul Postma

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerPetter Granberg: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentilePetter Granberg: Assists, 0.07 a game, 9th percentilePetter Granberg: Points, 0.07 a game, 5th percentilePetter Granberg: Shots, 0.44 a game, 3rd percentilePetter Granberg: Hits, 1.78 a game, 73rd percentilePetter Granberg: Corsi for %, 44.8%, 7th percentilePetter Granberg: CF% rel, -7.3, 1st percentilePetter Granberg: On-ice xG %, 43.7%, 5th percentilePetter Granberg: Rating, -1.6 goals above replacement, 12th percentilePetter Granberg: Chances created, 0.05 xG per 60, 1st percentilePetter Granberg: Shot quality, 2.0% a shot, 2nd percentilePetter Granberg: Finishing, -0.3 goals above expected, 46th percentilePaul Postma: Goals, 0.08 a game, 70th percentilePaul Postma: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentilePaul Postma: Points, 0.08 a game, 6th percentilePaul Postma: Shots, 0.92 a game, 28th percentilePaul Postma: Hits, 0.50 a game, 8th percentilePaul Postma: Corsi for %, 53.7%, 88th percentilePaul Postma: CF% rel, 3.6, 89th percentilePaul Postma: On-ice xG %, 52.0%, 73rd percentilePaul Postma: Rating, +0.8 goals above replacement, 37th percentilePaul Postma: Chances created, 0.22 xG per 60, 63rd percentilePaul Postma: Shot quality, 3.0% a shot, 45th percentilePaul Postma: Finishing, +0.9 goals above expected, 70th percentile
00.511.5220Petter Granberg 2Paul Postma 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Petter Granberg
Paul Postma

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Petter Granberg D, NSH 2015-16 Paul Postma D, BOS
27 Games played 26
0 Goals 2
2 Assists 0
2 Points 2
0.07 Points per game 0.08
1 Plus/minus -3
12 Shots 24
0.0 Shooting % 8.3
48 Hits 13
13 Penalty minutes 4
13:43 Average ice time 11:27
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.8 Corsi for % 53.7
-7.3 CF% relative to team +3.6
45.3 Fenwick for % 52.7
43.7 Expected goals for % 52.0
-11.0 xGF% relative to team +2.4
52.4 Goals for % 42.9
102.1 PDO 96.2
21 Shot attempts taken 52
Expected goals, all situations
0.3 Expected goals 1.1
0.05 Expected goals per 60 0.22
2.0% Chance per attempt 3.0%
-0.3 Goals above expected +0.9
Rating, in goals
-1.6 Goals above replacement +0.8
-0.3 Wins above replacement +0.1
-2.0 Even-strength offence -0.2
-0.8 Even-strength defence +0.5
0.0 Power play -0.2
+0.2 Penalty kill -0.1
-0.3 Penalties -0.3
Contract
$600K Cap hit $888K
$300K Cap dollars per point $444K
-$449K Worth at the going rate $1M
-$1M Value: worth minus cap hit +$156K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean