Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Chris Wagner Nate Thompson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerChris Wagner: Goals, 0.09 a game, 25th percentileChris Wagner: Assists, 0.05 a game, 5th percentileChris Wagner: Points, 0.14 a game, 10th percentileChris Wagner: Shots, 1.28 a game, 31st percentileChris Wagner: Hits, 2.21 a game, 88th percentileChris Wagner: Corsi for %, 46.2%, 18th percentileChris Wagner: CF% rel, -0.2, 45th percentileChris Wagner: On-ice xG %, 48.5%, 38th percentileChris Wagner: Rating, +2.4 goals above replacement, 48th percentileChris Wagner: Chances created, 0.63 xG per 60, 34th percentileChris Wagner: Shot quality, 5.8% a shot, 5th percentileChris Wagner: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 54th percentileNate Thompson: Goals, 0.06 a game, 13th percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.06 a game, 8th percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.12 a game, 8th percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 0.86 a game, 10th percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 2.10 a game, 86th percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 49.0%, 37th percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -4.4, 11th percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 50.5%, 53rd percentileNate Thompson: Rating, -0.9 goals above replacement, 14th percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.45 xG per 60, 8th percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 7.6% a shot, 53rd percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, -1.3 goals above expected, 40th percentile
02462040Chris Wagner 6Nate Thompson 6

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Chris Wagner
Nate Thompson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Chris Wagner R, COL 2015-16 Nate Thompson C, PHI
43 Games played 49
4 Goals 3
2 Assists 3
6 Points 6
0.14 Points per game 0.12
-2 Plus/minus -1
55 Shots 42
7.3 Shooting % 7.1
95 Hits 103
28 Penalty minutes 47
9:09 Average ice time 11:36
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.2 Corsi for % 49.0
-0.2 CF% relative to team -4.4
46.4 Fenwick for % 50.1
48.5 Expected goals for % 50.5
+6.0 xGF% relative to team -5.6
43.8 Goals for % 45.8
99.4 PDO 98.9
85 Shot attempts taken 69
Expected goals, all situations
4.1 Expected goals 4.3
0.63 Expected goals per 60 0.45
5.8% Chance per attempt 7.6%
-0.1 Goals above expected -1.3
Rating, in goals
+2.4 Goals above replacement -0.9
+0.4 Wins above replacement -0.1
-0.8 Even-strength offence -3.0
+2.0 Even-strength defence +1.8
0.0 Power play -0.1
+0.3 Penalty kill +0.2
-0.1 Penalties -1.3
Contract
$600K Cap hit $1.6M
$100K Cap dollars per point $267K
$2.1M Worth at the going rate -$7K
+$1.5M Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean