Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Brett Connolly Chris Tierney

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerBrett Connolly: Goals, 0.23 a game, 70th percentileBrett Connolly: Assists, 0.12 a game, 23rd percentileBrett Connolly: Points, 0.35 a game, 44th percentileBrett Connolly: Shots, 1.23 a game, 27th percentileBrett Connolly: Hits, 1.35 a game, 67th percentileBrett Connolly: Corsi for %, 53.8%, 84th percentileBrett Connolly: CF% rel, 2.7, 76th percentileBrett Connolly: On-ice xG %, 53.1%, 73rd percentileBrett Connolly: Rating, +1.8 goals above replacement, 40th percentileBrett Connolly: Chances created, 0.61 xG per 60, 26th percentileBrett Connolly: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 41st percentileBrett Connolly: Finishing, +7.8 goals above expected, 95th percentileChris Tierney: Goals, 0.14 a game, 39th percentileChris Tierney: Assists, 0.15 a game, 29th percentileChris Tierney: Points, 0.29 a game, 33rd percentileChris Tierney: Shots, 1.13 a game, 20th percentileChris Tierney: Hits, 0.63 a game, 27th percentileChris Tierney: Corsi for %, 50.0%, 47th percentileChris Tierney: CF% rel, -1.5, 31st percentileChris Tierney: On-ice xG %, 50.6%, 54th percentileChris Tierney: Rating, +4.1 goals above replacement, 62nd percentileChris Tierney: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 17th percentileChris Tierney: Shot quality, 9.3% a shot, 92nd percentileChris Tierney: Finishing, +0.3 goals above expected, 57th percentile
0510152020406080Brett Connolly 23Chris Tierney 23

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Brett Connolly
Chris Tierney

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Brett Connolly R, CHI 2016-17 Chris Tierney C, NJD
66 Games played 80
15 Goals 11
8 Assists 12
23 Points 23
0.35 Points per game 0.29
20 Plus/minus 0
81 Shots 90
18.5 Shooting % 12.2
89 Hits 50
40 Penalty minutes 6
10:41 Average ice time 14:36
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.8 Corsi for % 50.0
+2.7 CF% relative to team -1.5
53.3 Fenwick for % 50.0
53.1 Expected goals for % 50.6
+1.9 xGF% relative to team -2.8
70.2 Goals for % 50.7
104.7 PDO 99.8
120 Shot attempts taken 130
Expected goals, all situations
7.2 Expected goals 10.7
0.61 Expected goals per 60 0.55
7.4% Chance per attempt 9.3%
+7.8 Goals above expected +0.3
Rating, in goals
+1.8 Goals above replacement +4.1
+0.3 Wins above replacement +0.7
+1.1 Even-strength offence -1.8
+0.5 Even-strength defence +0.4
+0.0 Power play -0.1
+0.0 Penalty kill -0.2
-1.7 Penalties +2.6
Contract
$850K Cap hit $712K
$37K Cap dollars per point $31K
$1.7M Worth at the going rate $3.2M
+$890K Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean