Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Petr Mrazek Cam Ward

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerPetr Mrazek: Save %, 0.921, 79th percentilePetr Mrazek: Goals against, 2.13 a game, 82nd percentilePetr Mrazek: Workload, 26.8 shots a game, 39th percentilePetr Mrazek: Games, 54 games, 71st percentilePetr Mrazek: Goals saved, +0.11 above expected per 60, 68th percentileCam Ward: Save %, 0.909, 31st percentileCam Ward: Goals against, 2.35 a game, 53rd percentileCam Ward: Workload, 25.8 shots a game, 16th percentileCam Ward: Games, 52 games, 69th percentileCam Ward: Goals saved, -0.04 above expected per 60, 40th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Petr Mrazek G, ANA 2015-16 Cam Ward G, CHI
54 Games played 52
27 Wins 23
16 Losses 17
4 Shutouts 1
1,448 Shots against 1,343
1,333 Saves 1,221
115 Goals against 122
0.921 Save % 0.909
2.33 Goals against average 2.41
Expected goals, while he was in net
120.6 Expected goals against 119.9
+5.6 Goals saved above expected -2.1
+0.11 Saved above expected per 60 -0.04
6.1% Chance per attempt faced 6.3%
Rating, in goals
+17.9 Goals above replacement +10.1
+3.0 Wins above replacement +1.7
Contract
$738K Cap hit $6.3M
$4.8M Worth at the going rate $3M
+$4.1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$3.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean