Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Petr Mrazek Thomas Greiss

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerPetr Mrazek: Save %, 0.901, 5th percentilePetr Mrazek: Goals against, 2.90 a game, 2nd percentilePetr Mrazek: Workload, 29.2 shots a game, 65th percentilePetr Mrazek: Games, 50 games, 53rd percentilePetr Mrazek: Goals saved, -0.38 above expected per 60, 9th percentileThomas Greiss: Save %, 0.913, 40th percentileThomas Greiss: Goals against, 2.47 a game, 38th percentileThomas Greiss: Workload, 28.5 shots a game, 51st percentileThomas Greiss: Games, 51 games, 58th percentileThomas Greiss: Goals saved, +0.15 above expected per 60, 65th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Petr Mrazek G, ANA 2016-17 Thomas Greiss G, STL
50 Games played 51
18 Wins 26
21 Losses 18
1 Shutouts 3
1,462 Shots against 1,453
1,317 Saves 1,327
145 Goals against 126
0.901 Save % 0.913
3.04 Goals against average 2.69
Expected goals, while he was in net
126.8 Expected goals against 132.8
-18.2 Goals saved above expected +6.8
-0.38 Saved above expected per 60 +0.15
6.4% Chance per attempt faced 6.4%
Rating, in goals
-5.2 Goals above replacement +20.4
-0.9 Wins above replacement +3.4
Contract
$4M Cap hit $1.5M
-$562K Worth at the going rate $5M
-$4.6M Value: worth minus cap hit +$3.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean