Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Petr Mrazek Mike Condon

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerPetr Mrazek: Save %, 0.921, 79th percentilePetr Mrazek: Goals against, 2.13 a game, 82nd percentilePetr Mrazek: Workload, 26.8 shots a game, 39th percentilePetr Mrazek: Games, 54 games, 71st percentilePetr Mrazek: Goals saved, +0.11 above expected per 60, 68th percentileMike Condon: Save %, 0.903, 11th percentileMike Condon: Goals against, 2.56 a game, 19th percentileMike Condon: Workload, 26.5 shots a game, 31st percentileMike Condon: Games, 55 games, 74th percentileMike Condon: Goals saved, -0.32 above expected per 60, 11th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Petr Mrazek G, ANA 2015-16 Mike Condon G, OTT
54 Games played 55
27 Wins 21
16 Losses 25
4 Shutouts 1
1,448 Shots against 1,458
1,333 Saves 1,317
115 Goals against 141
0.921 Save % 0.903
2.33 Goals against average 2.71
Expected goals, while he was in net
120.6 Expected goals against 124.6
+5.6 Goals saved above expected -16.4
+0.11 Saved above expected per 60 -0.32
6.1% Chance per attempt faced 6.2%
Rating, in goals
+17.9 Goals above replacement -3.7
+3.0 Wins above replacement -0.6
Contract
$738K Cap hit $575K
$4.8M Worth at the going rate -$312K
+$4.1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$887K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean