Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Kevin Gravel Nate Prosser

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerKevin Gravel: Goals, 0.02 a game, 18th percentileKevin Gravel: Assists, 0.12 a game, 21st percentileKevin Gravel: Points, 0.14 a game, 16th percentileKevin Gravel: Shots, 1.06 a game, 32nd percentileKevin Gravel: Hits, 1.49 a game, 63rd percentileKevin Gravel: Corsi for %, 54.9%, 96th percentileKevin Gravel: CF% rel, 1.3, 70th percentileKevin Gravel: On-ice xG %, 57.3%, 96th percentileKevin Gravel: Rating, +3.1 goals above replacement, 62nd percentileKevin Gravel: Chances created, 0.17 xG per 60, 45th percentileKevin Gravel: Shot quality, 2.4% a shot, 17th percentileKevin Gravel: Finishing, -1.0 goals above expected, 32nd percentileNate Prosser: Goals, 0.05 a game, 49th percentileNate Prosser: Assists, 0.13 a game, 23rd percentileNate Prosser: Points, 0.18 a game, 28th percentileNate Prosser: Shots, 0.51 a game, 1st percentileNate Prosser: Hits, 0.77 a game, 24th percentileNate Prosser: Corsi for %, 45.9%, 8th percentileNate Prosser: CF% rel, -3.5, 14th percentileNate Prosser: On-ice xG %, 50.5%, 56th percentileNate Prosser: Rating, +0.3 goals above replacement, 34th percentileNate Prosser: Chances created, 0.09 xG per 60, 5th percentileNate Prosser: Shot quality, 2.0% a shot, 1st percentileNate Prosser: Finishing, +1.2 goals above expected, 77th percentile
02462040Kevin Gravel 7Nate Prosser 7

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Kevin Gravel
Nate Prosser

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Kevin Gravel D, NSH 2016-17 Nate Prosser D, PHI
49 Games played 39
1 Goals 2
6 Assists 5
7 Points 7
0.14 Points per game 0.18
3 Plus/minus 0
52 Shots 20
1.9 Shooting % 10.0
73 Hits 30
6 Penalty minutes 12
14:09 Average ice time 12:44
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
54.9 Corsi for % 45.9
+1.3 CF% relative to team -3.5
56.7 Fenwick for % 48.7
57.3 Expected goals for % 50.5
+1.3 xGF% relative to team -5.1
58.3 Goals for % 50.0
100.5 PDO 100.6
102 Shot attempts taken 51
Expected goals, all situations
2.0 Expected goals 0.8
0.17 Expected goals per 60 0.09
2.4% Chance per attempt 2.0%
-1.0 Goals above expected +1.2
Rating, in goals
+3.1 Goals above replacement +0.3
+0.5 Wins above replacement +0.0
-2.1 Even-strength offence -1.5
+2.4 Even-strength defence +0.6
-0.4 Power play +0.0
+0.3 Penalty kill +0.3
+0.6 Penalties -0.8
Contract
$668K Cap hit $625K
$95K Cap dollars per point $89K
$2.5M Worth at the going rate $765K
+$1.9M Value: worth minus cap hit +$140K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean