Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Frederik Andersen Ray Emery

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerFrederik Andersen: Save %, 0.923, 82nd percentileFrederik Andersen: Goals against, 2.14 a game, 77th percentileFrederik Andersen: Workload, 28.0 shots a game, 60th percentileFrederik Andersen: Games, 28 games, 31st percentileFrederik Andersen: Goals saved, +0.28 above expected per 60, 81st percentileRay Emery: Save %, 0.903, 22nd percentileRay Emery: Goals against, 2.46 a game, 42nd percentileRay Emery: Workload, 25.4 shots a game, 17th percentileRay Emery: Games, 28 games, 31st percentileRay Emery: Goals saved, -0.21 above expected per 60, 27th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 65 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Frederik Andersen G, CAR 2013-14 Ray Emery G, PHI
28 Games played 28
20 Wins 9
5 Losses 12
0 Shutouts 2
783 Shots against 711
723 Saves 642
60 Goals against 69
0.923 Save % 0.903
2.29 Goals against average 2.96
Expected goals, while he was in net
67.3 Expected goals against 64.0
+7.3 Goals saved above expected -5.0
+0.28 Saved above expected per 60 -0.21
6.1% Chance per attempt faced 6.4%
Rating, in goals
+14.2 Goals above replacement +1.5
+2.4 Wins above replacement +0.3
Contract
$925K Cap hit $1.65M
$3.4M Worth at the going rate $847K
+$2.5M Value: worth minus cap hit -$803K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean