Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Frederik Andersen Thomas Greiss

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerFrederik Andersen: Save %, 0.919, 68th percentileFrederik Andersen: Goals against, 2.05 a game, 89th percentileFrederik Andersen: Workload, 25.3 shots a game, 13th percentileFrederik Andersen: Games, 43 games, 60th percentileFrederik Andersen: Goals saved, +0.04 above expected per 60, 58th percentileThomas Greiss: Save %, 0.925, 95th percentileThomas Greiss: Goals against, 2.20 a game, 73rd percentileThomas Greiss: Workload, 29.2 shots a game, 77th percentileThomas Greiss: Games, 41 games, 56th percentileThomas Greiss: Goals saved, +0.33 above expected per 60, 91st percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Frederik Andersen G, CAR 2015-16 Thomas Greiss G, STL
43 Games played 41
22 Wins 23
9 Losses 11
3 Shutouts 1
1,086 Shots against 1,197
998 Saves 1,107
88 Goals against 90
0.919 Save % 0.925
2.30 Goals against average 2.36
Expected goals, while he was in net
89.7 Expected goals against 102.7
+1.7 Goals saved above expected +12.7
+0.04 Saved above expected per 60 +0.33
5.8% Chance per attempt faced 6.3%
Rating, in goals
+10.8 Goals above replacement +23.1
+1.8 Wins above replacement +3.9
Contract
$1.15M Cap hit $1.5M
$3.2M Worth at the going rate $6.1M
+$2M Value: worth minus cap hit +$4.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean