Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Frederik Andersen Chad Johnson

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerFrederik Andersen: Save %, 0.919, 68th percentileFrederik Andersen: Goals against, 2.05 a game, 89th percentileFrederik Andersen: Workload, 25.3 shots a game, 13th percentileFrederik Andersen: Games, 43 games, 60th percentileFrederik Andersen: Goals saved, +0.04 above expected per 60, 58th percentileChad Johnson: Save %, 0.920, 73rd percentileChad Johnson: Goals against, 2.27 a game, 61st percentileChad Johnson: Workload, 28.2 shots a game, 65th percentileChad Johnson: Games, 45 games, 63rd percentileChad Johnson: Goals saved, +0.17 above expected per 60, 79th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Frederik Andersen G, CAR 2015-16 Chad Johnson G, ANA
43 Games played 45
22 Wins 22
9 Losses 16
3 Shutouts 1
1,086 Shots against 1,270
998 Saves 1,168
88 Goals against 102
0.919 Save % 0.920
2.30 Goals against average 2.36
Expected goals, while he was in net
89.7 Expected goals against 109.5
+1.7 Goals saved above expected +7.5
+0.04 Saved above expected per 60 +0.17
5.8% Chance per attempt faced 6.1%
Rating, in goals
+10.8 Goals above replacement +18.7
+1.8 Wins above replacement +3.1
Contract
$1.15M Cap hit $1.3M
$3.2M Worth at the going rate $5M
+$2M Value: worth minus cap hit +$3.7M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean