Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Frederik Andersen Martin Jones

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerFrederik Andersen: Save %, 0.918, 64th percentileFrederik Andersen: Goals against, 2.56 a game, 29th percentileFrederik Andersen: Workload, 31.1 shots a game, 87th percentileFrederik Andersen: Games, 66 games, 96th percentileFrederik Andersen: Goals saved, +0.27 above expected per 60, 80th percentileMartin Jones: Save %, 0.912, 35th percentileMartin Jones: Goals against, 2.34 a game, 62nd percentileMartin Jones: Workload, 26.5 shots a game, 22nd percentileMartin Jones: Games, 65 games, 91st percentileMartin Jones: Goals saved, +0.12 above expected per 60, 64th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Frederik Andersen G, CAR 2016-17 Martin Jones G, TOR
66 Games played 65
33 Wins 35
16 Losses 23
4 Shutouts 2
2,052 Shots against 1,725
1,883 Saves 1,573
169 Goals against 152
0.918 Save % 0.912
2.67 Goals against average 2.40
Expected goals, while he was in net
186.1 Expected goals against 159.9
+17.1 Goals saved above expected +7.9
+0.27 Saved above expected per 60 +0.12
6.4% Chance per attempt faced 6.4%
Rating, in goals
+36.0 Goals above replacement +24.2
+6.0 Wins above replacement +4.0
Contract
$5M Cap hit $3M
$8.4M Worth at the going rate $5.8M
+$3.4M Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.8M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean