Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Zach Trotman William Lagesson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerZach Trotman: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileZach Trotman: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileZach Trotman: Points, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileZach Trotman: Shots, 1.38 a game, 49th percentileZach Trotman: Hits, 2.63 a game, 94th percentileZach Trotman: Corsi for %, 54.3%, 93rd percentileZach Trotman: CF% rel, 0.6, 62nd percentileZach Trotman: On-ice xG %, 49.4%, 52nd percentileZach Trotman: Rating, -0.9 goals above replacement, 26th percentileZach Trotman: Chances created, 0.22 xG per 60, 56th percentileZach Trotman: Shot quality, 2.5% a shot, 20th percentileZach Trotman: Finishing, -0.4 goals above expected, 42nd percentileWilliam Lagesson: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileWilliam Lagesson: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileWilliam Lagesson: Points, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileWilliam Lagesson: Shots, 1.00 a game, 18th percentileWilliam Lagesson: Hits, 0.50 a game, 9th percentileWilliam Lagesson: Corsi for %, 45.8%, 15th percentileWilliam Lagesson: CF% rel, -4.6, 15th percentileWilliam Lagesson: On-ice xG %, 39.9%, 1st percentileWilliam Lagesson: Rating, -0.4 goals above replacement, 34th percentileWilliam Lagesson: Chances created, 0.17 xG per 60, 37th percentileWilliam Lagesson: Shot quality, 2.2% a shot, 11th percentileWilliam Lagesson: Finishing, -0.3 goals above expected, 47th percentile
00.20.40.60.81Zach Trotman 0William Lagesson 0

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Zach Trotman
William Lagesson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Zach Trotman D, PIT 2019-20 William Lagesson D, DET
8 Games played 8
0 Goals 0
0 Assists 0
0 Points 0
0.00 Points per game 0.00
-1 Plus/minus -4
11 Shots 8
0.0 Shooting % 0.0
21 Hits 4
4 Penalty minutes 0
14:43 Average ice time 11:52
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
54.3 Corsi for % 45.8
+0.6 CF% relative to team -4.6
57.6 Fenwick for % 44.6
49.4 Expected goals for % 39.9
-6.1 xGF% relative to team -9.9
50.0 Goals for % 25.0
97.9 PDO 92.8
24 Shot attempts taken 17
Expected goals, all situations
0.4 Expected goals 0.3
0.22 Expected goals per 60 0.17
2.5% Chance per attempt 2.2%
-0.4 Goals above expected -0.3
Rating, in goals
-0.9 Goals above replacement -0.4
-0.1 Wins above replacement -0.1
-0.7 Even-strength offence -0.5
-0.1 Even-strength defence -0.4
-0.1 Power play +0.0
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.1
-0.3 Penalties +0.2
Contract
$700K Cap hit $742K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean