Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2024-25 season

At a glance

John Klingberg Louis Crevier

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJohn Klingberg: Goals, 0.09 a game, 75th percentileJohn Klingberg: Assists, 0.27 a game, 68th percentileJohn Klingberg: Points, 0.36 a game, 69th percentileJohn Klingberg: Shots, 1.73 a game, 80th percentileJohn Klingberg: Hits, 0.45 a game, 17th percentileJohn Klingberg: Corsi for %, 50.4%, 56th percentileJohn Klingberg: CF% rel, -5.9, 1st percentileJohn Klingberg: On-ice xG %, 44.2%, 8th percentileJohn Klingberg: Rating, -1.2 goals above replacement, 17th percentileJohn Klingberg: Chances created, 0.28 xG per 60, 80th percentileJohn Klingberg: Shot quality, 3.4% a shot, 63rd percentileJohn Klingberg: Finishing, +0.1 goals above expected, 54th percentileLouis Crevier: Goals, 0.09 a game, 75th percentileLouis Crevier: Assists, 0.03 a game, 1st percentileLouis Crevier: Points, 0.13 a game, 9th percentileLouis Crevier: Shots, 0.88 a game, 26th percentileLouis Crevier: Hits, 2.19 a game, 93rd percentileLouis Crevier: Corsi for %, 41.4%, 1st percentileLouis Crevier: CF% rel, -2.2, 27th percentileLouis Crevier: On-ice xG %, 43.0%, 4th percentileLouis Crevier: Rating, +1.4 goals above replacement, 41st percentileLouis Crevier: Chances created, 0.13 xG per 60, 25th percentileLouis Crevier: Shot quality, 2.6% a shot, 27th percentileLouis Crevier: Finishing, +1.8 goals above expected, 83rd percentile
0123420John Klingberg 4Louis Crevier 4

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

John Klingberg
Louis Crevier

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

John Klingberg D, SJS 2024-25 Louis Crevier D, BUF
11 Games played 32
1 Goals 3
3 Assists 1
4 Points 4
0.36 Points per game 0.13
0 Plus/minus -6
19 Shots 28
5.3 Shooting % 10.7
5 Hits 70
8 Penalty minutes 10
17:15 Average ice time 17:17
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.4 Corsi for % 41.4
-5.9 CF% relative to team -2.2
50.5 Fenwick for % 40.1
44.2 Expected goals for % 43.0
-5.3 xGF% relative to team +1.6
47.1 Goals for % 41.9
99.3 PDO 101.1
39 Shot attempts taken 67
Expected goals, all situations
0.9 Expected goals 1.2
0.28 Expected goals per 60 0.13
3.4% Chance per attempt 2.6%
+0.1 Goals above expected +1.8
Rating, in goals
-1.2 Goals above replacement +1.4
-0.2 Wins above replacement +0.2
+0.1 Even-strength offence -1.3
-1.3 Even-strength defence +1.7
-0.1 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill -0.2
-0.6 Penalties -0.4
Contract
$1.755M Cap hit $775K
$439K Cap dollars per point $194K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean