Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Mark Stone Daniel Cleary

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMark Stone: Goals, 0.21 a game, 64th percentileMark Stone: Assists, 0.21 a game, 46th percentileMark Stone: Points, 0.42 a game, 51st percentileMark Stone: Shots, 1.89 a game, 60th percentileMark Stone: Hits, 0.53 a game, 18th percentileMark Stone: Corsi for %, 57.9%, 96th percentileMark Stone: CF% rel, 6.0, 94th percentileMark Stone: On-ice xG %, 56.4%, 89th percentileMark Stone: Rating, +3.5 goals above replacement, 56th percentileMark Stone: Chances created, 1.33 xG per 60, 99th percentileMark Stone: Shot quality, 10.2% a shot, 99th percentileMark Stone: Finishing, -2.1 goals above expected, 32nd percentileDaniel Cleary: Goals, 0.08 a game, 20th percentileDaniel Cleary: Assists, 0.08 a game, 13th percentileDaniel Cleary: Points, 0.15 a game, 14th percentileDaniel Cleary: Shots, 1.23 a game, 28th percentileDaniel Cleary: Hits, 0.98 a game, 43rd percentileDaniel Cleary: Corsi for %, 47.3%, 25th percentileDaniel Cleary: CF% rel, -4.4, 13th percentileDaniel Cleary: On-ice xG %, 41.7%, 6th percentileDaniel Cleary: Rating, -4.7 goals above replacement, 2nd percentileDaniel Cleary: Chances created, 0.42 xG per 60, 6th percentileDaniel Cleary: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 17th percentileDaniel Cleary: Finishing, -1.1 goals above expected, 42nd percentile
024682040Mark Stone 8Daniel Cleary 8

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Mark Stone
Daniel Cleary

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Mark Stone R, VGK 2013-14 Daniel Cleary R, DET
19 Games played 52
4 Goals 4
4 Assists 4
8 Points 8
0.42 Points per game 0.15
5 Plus/minus -11
36 Shots 64
11.1 Shooting % 6.3
10 Hits 51
4 Penalty minutes 31
14:29 Average ice time 13:54
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
57.9 Corsi for % 47.3
+6.0 CF% relative to team -4.4
56.9 Fenwick for % 47.3
56.4 Expected goals for % 41.7
+9.6 xGF% relative to team -10.5
62.5 Goals for % 32.4
101.8 PDO 96.7
59 Shot attempts taken 86
Expected goals, all situations
6.1 Expected goals 5.1
1.33 Expected goals per 60 0.42
10.2% Chance per attempt 6.4%
-2.1 Goals above expected -1.1
Rating, in goals
+3.5 Goals above replacement -4.7
+0.6 Wins above replacement -0.8
+1.6 Even-strength offence -3.5
+1.0 Even-strength defence -1.9
+0.2 Power play -1.0
+0.1 Penalty kill +0.4
-0.1 Penalties -0.7
Contract
$603K Cap hit $1.75M
$75K Cap dollars per point $219K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean