Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2026-27 season

At a glance

Mark Stone Mikael Granlund

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMark Stone: Goals, 0.50 a game, 85th percentileMark Stone: Assists, 0.67 a game, 90th percentileMark Stone: Points, 1.17 a game, 92nd percentileMark Stone: Shots, 2.33 a game, 79th percentileMark Stone: Hits, 1.67 a game, 65th percentileMark Stone: Corsi for %, 60.9%, 89th percentileMark Stone: CF% rel, 5.9, 76th percentileMark Stone: On-ice xG %, 68.3%, 95th percentileMark Stone: Rating, +16.9 goals above replacement, 98th percentileMark Stone: Chances created, 1.19 xG per 60, 81st percentileMark Stone: Shot quality, 12.1% a shot, 92nd percentileMark Stone: Finishing, -0.3 goals above expected, 41st percentileMikael Granlund: Goals, 0.40 a game, 77th percentileMikael Granlund: Assists, 1.00 a game, 97th percentileMikael Granlund: Points, 1.40 a game, 96th percentileMikael Granlund: Shots, 2.00 a game, 68th percentileMikael Granlund: Hits, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileMikael Granlund: Corsi for %, 44.0%, 23rd percentileMikael Granlund: CF% rel, -4.9, 26th percentileMikael Granlund: On-ice xG %, 47.2%, 38th percentileMikael Granlund: Rating, +5.8 goals above replacement, 71st percentileMikael Granlund: Chances created, 0.82 xG per 60, 53rd percentileMikael Granlund: Shot quality, 7.5% a shot, 35th percentileMikael Granlund: Finishing, +0.6 goals above expected, 81st percentile
0246Mark Stone 7Mikael Granlund 7

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Mark Stone
Mikael Granlund

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Mark Stone R, VGK 2026-27 Mikael Granlund C, ANA
6 Games played 5
3 Goals 2
4 Assists 5
7 Points 7
1.17 Points per game 1.40
6 Plus/minus 0
14 Shots 10
21.4 Shooting % 20.0
10 Hits 0
9 Penalty minutes 0
19:21 Average ice time 19:43
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
60.9 Corsi for % 44.0
+5.9 CF% relative to team -4.9
62.1 Fenwick for % 47.5
68.3 Expected goals for % 47.2
+8.1 xGF% relative to team -3.8
100.0 Goals for % 50.0
110.0 PDO 96.2
15 Shot attempts taken 12
Expected goals, all situations
2.3 Expected goals 1.4
1.19 Expected goals per 60 0.82
12.1% Chance per attempt 7.5%
-0.3 Goals above expected +0.6
Rating, in goals
+16.9 Goals above replacement +5.8
+2.8 Wins above replacement +1.0
+3.9 Even-strength offence +0.2
+3.1 Even-strength defence -0.8
+4.8 Power play +1.0
+0.3 Penalty kill -0.2
+1.3 Penalties +1.8
Contract
$9.5M Cap hit $7M
$1.357M Cap dollars per point $1M
$17.1M Worth at the going rate $6.4M
+$7.6M Value: worth minus cap hit -$622K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. The season is still being played, so each rating is projected over the whole season: the games played so far, plus the games left at the rate of the last three seasons and this one. What the advanced numbers mean