Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Matthew Peca David Booth

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMatthew Peca: Goals, 0.20 a game, 60th percentileMatthew Peca: Assists, 0.30 a game, 66th percentileMatthew Peca: Points, 0.50 a game, 62nd percentileMatthew Peca: Shots, 1.70 a game, 49th percentileMatthew Peca: Hits, 1.10 a game, 56th percentileMatthew Peca: Corsi for %, 42.8%, 2nd percentileMatthew Peca: CF% rel, -5.7, 5th percentileMatthew Peca: On-ice xG %, 40.8%, 1st percentileMatthew Peca: Rating, +0.6 goals above replacement, 30th percentileMatthew Peca: Chances created, 0.71 xG per 60, 44th percentileMatthew Peca: Shot quality, 8.6% a shot, 79th percentileMatthew Peca: Finishing, +0.4 goals above expected, 57th percentileDavid Booth: Goals, 0.14 a game, 37th percentileDavid Booth: Assists, 0.04 a game, 1st percentileDavid Booth: Points, 0.18 a game, 10th percentileDavid Booth: Shots, 1.18 a game, 23rd percentileDavid Booth: Hits, 0.82 a game, 41st percentileDavid Booth: Corsi for %, 40.5%, 1st percentileDavid Booth: CF% rel, -9.0, 1st percentileDavid Booth: On-ice xG %, 35.7%, 1st percentileDavid Booth: Rating, -1.8 goals above replacement, 7th percentileDavid Booth: Chances created, 0.69 xG per 60, 42nd percentileDavid Booth: Shot quality, 5.5% a shot, 2nd percentileDavid Booth: Finishing, +1.7 goals above expected, 67th percentile
01234520Matthew Peca 5David Booth 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Matthew Peca
David Booth

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Matthew Peca C, STL 2017-18 David Booth L, DET
10 Games played 28
2 Goals 4
3 Assists 1
5 Points 5
0.50 Points per game 0.18
6 Plus/minus -5
17 Shots 33
11.8 Shooting % 12.1
11 Hits 23
0 Penalty minutes 10
13:40 Average ice time 6:58
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
42.8 Corsi for % 40.5
-5.7 CF% relative to team -9.0
41.7 Fenwick for % 41.9
40.8 Expected goals for % 35.7
-11.5 xGF% relative to team -12.9
69.2 Goals for % 30.8
110.2 PDO 96.1
20 Shot attempts taken 49
Expected goals, all situations
1.6 Expected goals 2.3
0.71 Expected goals per 60 0.69
8.6% Chance per attempt 5.5%
+0.4 Goals above expected +1.7
Rating, in goals
+0.6 Goals above replacement -1.8
+0.1 Wins above replacement -0.3
+0.2 Even-strength offence -0.8
-0.3 Even-strength defence -1.1
0.0 Power play +0.2
-0.3 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.7 Penalties -0.6
Contract
$650K Cap hit $700K
$130K Cap dollars per point $140K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean