Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2026-27 season

At a glance

Josh Manson Brent Burns

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJosh Manson: Goals, 0.20 a game, 79th percentileJosh Manson: Assists, 0.40 a game, 73rd percentileJosh Manson: Points, 0.60 a game, 79th percentileJosh Manson: Shots, 1.20 a game, 57th percentileJosh Manson: Hits, 1.80 a game, 83rd percentileJosh Manson: Corsi for %, 54.8%, 73rd percentileJosh Manson: CF% rel, 1.4, 62nd percentileJosh Manson: On-ice xG %, 66.2%, 95th percentileJosh Manson: Rating, +7.1 goals above replacement, 86th percentileJosh Manson: Chances created, 0.23 xG per 60, 64th percentileJosh Manson: Shot quality, 3.0% a shot, 41st percentileJosh Manson: Finishing, +0.7 goals above expected, 87th percentileBrent Burns: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileBrent Burns: Assists, 0.60 a game, 86th percentileBrent Burns: Points, 0.60 a game, 79th percentileBrent Burns: Shots, 1.40 a game, 68th percentileBrent Burns: Hits, 0.60 a game, 37th percentileBrent Burns: Corsi for %, 54.7%, 72nd percentileBrent Burns: CF% rel, 1.2, 61st percentileBrent Burns: On-ice xG %, 61.5%, 85th percentileBrent Burns: Rating, +5.2 goals above replacement, 75th percentileBrent Burns: Chances created, 0.19 xG per 60, 53rd percentileBrent Burns: Shot quality, 1.6% a shot, 12th percentileBrent Burns: Finishing, -0.3 goals above expected, 27th percentile
0123Josh Manson 3Brent Burns 3

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Josh Manson
Brent Burns

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Josh Manson D, COL 2026-27 Brent Burns D, COL
5 Games played 5
1 Goals 0
2 Assists 3
3 Points 3
0.60 Points per game 0.60
5 Plus/minus -2
6 Shots 7
16.7 Shooting % 0.0
9 Hits 3
0 Penalty minutes 2
16:53 Average ice time 16:20
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
54.8 Corsi for % 54.7
+1.4 CF% relative to team +1.2
57.7 Fenwick for % 57.9
66.2 Expected goals for % 61.5
+12.9 xGF% relative to team +5.5
71.4 Goals for % 45.5
108.4 PDO 91.8
11 Shot attempts taken 19
Expected goals, all situations
0.3 Expected goals 0.3
0.23 Expected goals per 60 0.19
3.0% Chance per attempt 1.6%
+0.7 Goals above expected -0.3
Rating, in goals
+7.1 Goals above replacement +5.2
+1.2 Wins above replacement +0.9
+1.8 Even-strength offence +2.1
+1.8 Even-strength defence -1.3
0.0 Power play -0.8
+0.6 Penalty kill +1.1
-1.3 Penalties -1.3
Contract
$3.95M Cap hit $850K
$1.317M Cap dollars per point $283K
$7.6M Worth at the going rate $5.8M
+$3.7M Value: worth minus cap hit +$4.9M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. The season is still being played, so each rating is projected over the whole season: the games played so far, plus the games left at the rate of the last three seasons and this one. What the advanced numbers mean