Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Anton Forsberg Chad Johnson

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerAnton Forsberg: Save %, 0.908, 32nd percentileAnton Forsberg: Goals against, 2.43 a game, 58th percentileAnton Forsberg: Workload, 26.3 shots a game, 7th percentileAnton Forsberg: Games, 35 games, 35th percentileAnton Forsberg: Goals saved, -0.17 above expected per 60, 31st percentileChad Johnson: Save %, 0.891, 2nd percentileChad Johnson: Goals against, 2.92 a game, 15th percentileChad Johnson: Workload, 26.7 shots a game, 12th percentileChad Johnson: Games, 36 games, 40th percentileChad Johnson: Goals saved, -0.82 above expected per 60, 1st percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 60 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Anton Forsberg G, LAK 2017-18 Chad Johnson G, ANA
35 Games played 36
10 Wins 10
16 Losses 16
0 Shutouts 0
921 Shots against 962
836 Saves 857
85 Goals against 105
0.908 Save % 0.891
2.97 Goals against average 3.55
Expected goals, while he was in net
80.2 Expected goals against 80.9
-4.8 Goals saved above expected -24.1
-0.17 Saved above expected per 60 -0.82
6.7% Chance per attempt faced 6.1%
Rating, in goals
+3.4 Goals above replacement -15.9
+0.6 Wins above replacement -2.6
Contract
$750K Cap hit $2.5M
$1.4M Worth at the going rate -$3M
+$636K Value: worth minus cap hit -$5.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean