Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Andrew Shaw Craig Smith

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerAndrew Shaw: Goals, 0.18 a game, 55th percentileAndrew Shaw: Assists, 0.25 a game, 59th percentileAndrew Shaw: Points, 0.43 a game, 56th percentileAndrew Shaw: Shots, 1.87 a game, 60th percentileAndrew Shaw: Hits, 2.16 a game, 89th percentileAndrew Shaw: Corsi for %, 55.0%, 93rd percentileAndrew Shaw: CF% rel, 3.6, 83rd percentileAndrew Shaw: On-ice xG %, 55.3%, 88th percentileAndrew Shaw: Rating, +3.2 goals above replacement, 55th percentileAndrew Shaw: Chances created, 0.84 xG per 60, 72nd percentileAndrew Shaw: Shot quality, 8.8% a shot, 82nd percentileAndrew Shaw: Finishing, -2.5 goals above expected, 25th percentileCraig Smith: Goals, 0.15 a game, 44th percentileCraig Smith: Assists, 0.22 a game, 49th percentileCraig Smith: Points, 0.37 a game, 48th percentileCraig Smith: Shots, 1.99 a game, 67th percentileCraig Smith: Hits, 1.19 a game, 61st percentileCraig Smith: Corsi for %, 54.2%, 88th percentileCraig Smith: CF% rel, 3.8, 85th percentileCraig Smith: On-ice xG %, 51.7%, 62nd percentileCraig Smith: Rating, +4.5 goals above replacement, 65th percentileCraig Smith: Chances created, 0.93 xG per 60, 82nd percentileCraig Smith: Shot quality, 7.1% a shot, 33rd percentileCraig Smith: Finishing, -4.7 goals above expected, 12th percentile
01020204060Andrew Shaw 29Craig Smith 29

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Andrew Shaw
Craig Smith

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Andrew Shaw R, CHI 2016-17 Craig Smith C, DET
68 Games played 78
12 Goals 12
17 Assists 17
29 Points 29
0.43 Points per game 0.37
4 Plus/minus 7
127 Shots 155
9.4 Shooting % 7.7
147 Hits 93
110 Penalty minutes 30
15:12 Average ice time 13:49
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
55.0 Corsi for % 54.2
+3.6 CF% relative to team +3.8
54.3 Fenwick for % 52.2
55.3 Expected goals for % 51.7
+2.8 xGF% relative to team +0.2
51.6 Goals for % 56.8
99.6 PDO 101.2
190 Shot attempts taken 283
Expected goals, all situations
14.5 Expected goals 16.7
0.84 Expected goals per 60 0.93
8.8% Chance per attempt 7.1%
-2.5 Goals above expected -4.7
Rating, in goals
+3.2 Goals above replacement +4.5
+0.5 Wins above replacement +0.8
+0.4 Even-strength offence +3.2
+1.4 Even-strength defence -1.3
-1.4 Power play -0.4
+0.1 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.1 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$3.9M Cap hit $4.25M
$134K Cap dollars per point $147K
$2.6M Worth at the going rate $3.5M
-$1.3M Value: worth minus cap hit -$782K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean