Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Vincent Trocheck Mark Stone

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerVincent Trocheck: Goals, 0.25 a game, 73rd percentileVincent Trocheck: Assists, 0.15 a game, 29th percentileVincent Trocheck: Points, 0.40 a game, 48th percentileVincent Trocheck: Shots, 1.90 a game, 60th percentileVincent Trocheck: Hits, 1.95 a game, 84th percentileVincent Trocheck: Corsi for %, 51.5%, 60th percentileVincent Trocheck: CF% rel, 3.4, 82nd percentileVincent Trocheck: On-ice xG %, 48.4%, 35th percentileVincent Trocheck: Rating, +1.0 goals above replacement, 33rd percentileVincent Trocheck: Chances created, 0.64 xG per 60, 33rd percentileVincent Trocheck: Shot quality, 6.7% a shot, 25th percentileVincent Trocheck: Finishing, 0.0 goals above expected, 52nd percentileMark Stone: Goals, 0.21 a game, 64th percentileMark Stone: Assists, 0.21 a game, 46th percentileMark Stone: Points, 0.42 a game, 51st percentileMark Stone: Shots, 1.89 a game, 60th percentileMark Stone: Hits, 0.53 a game, 18th percentileMark Stone: Corsi for %, 57.9%, 96th percentileMark Stone: CF% rel, 6.0, 94th percentileMark Stone: On-ice xG %, 56.4%, 89th percentileMark Stone: Rating, +3.5 goals above replacement, 56th percentileMark Stone: Chances created, 1.33 xG per 60, 99th percentileMark Stone: Shot quality, 10.2% a shot, 99th percentileMark Stone: Finishing, -2.1 goals above expected, 32nd percentile
0246820Vincent Trocheck 8Mark Stone 8

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Vincent Trocheck
Mark Stone

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Vincent Trocheck C, UTA 2013-14 Mark Stone R, VGK
20 Games played 19
5 Goals 4
3 Assists 4
8 Points 8
0.40 Points per game 0.42
-11 Plus/minus 5
38 Shots 36
13.2 Shooting % 11.1
39 Hits 10
6 Penalty minutes 4
18:53 Average ice time 14:29
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.5 Corsi for % 57.9
+3.4 CF% relative to team +6.0
50.7 Fenwick for % 56.9
48.4 Expected goals for % 56.4
+3.1 xGF% relative to team +9.6
27.3 Goals for % 62.5
92.1 PDO 101.8
55 Shot attempts taken 59
Expected goals, all situations
4.0 Expected goals 6.1
0.64 Expected goals per 60 1.33
6.7% Chance per attempt 10.2%
0.0 Goals above expected -2.1
Rating, in goals
+1.0 Goals above replacement +3.5
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.6
-1.1 Even-strength offence +1.6
+1.2 Even-strength defence +1.0
-0.2 Power play +0.2
-0.4 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.4 Penalties -0.1
Contract
$662K Cap hit $603K
$83K Cap dollars per point $75K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean