Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Blake Coleman Nate Thompson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerBlake Coleman: Goals, 0.04 a game, 7th percentileBlake Coleman: Assists, 0.04 a game, 4th percentileBlake Coleman: Points, 0.09 a game, 3rd percentileBlake Coleman: Shots, 1.26 a game, 29th percentileBlake Coleman: Hits, 2.22 a game, 90th percentileBlake Coleman: Corsi for %, 44.0%, 5th percentileBlake Coleman: CF% rel, -8.0, 3rd percentileBlake Coleman: On-ice xG %, 44.6%, 13th percentileBlake Coleman: Rating, -1.2 goals above replacement, 13th percentileBlake Coleman: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 18th percentileBlake Coleman: Shot quality, 7.2% a shot, 35th percentileBlake Coleman: Finishing, -1.7 goals above expected, 35th percentileNate Thompson: Goals, 0.03 a game, 4th percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.03 a game, 2nd percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.07 a game, 2nd percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 0.63 a game, 2nd percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 2.30 a game, 91st percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 40.7%, 1st percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -11.1, 1st percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 42.2%, 4th percentileNate Thompson: Rating, -1.7 goals above replacement, 9th percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.23 xG per 60, 1st percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 4.9% a shot, 1st percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, -0.2 goals above expected, 51st percentile
00.511.5220Blake Coleman 2Nate Thompson 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Blake Coleman
Nate Thompson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Blake Coleman L, MIN 2016-17 Nate Thompson C, PHI
23 Games played 30
1 Goals 1
1 Assists 1
2 Points 2
0.09 Points per game 0.07
-7 Plus/minus 4
29 Shots 19
3.4 Shooting % 5.3
51 Hits 69
27 Penalty minutes 14
12:51 Average ice time 10:23
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.0 Corsi for % 40.7
-8.0 CF% relative to team -11.1
45.4 Fenwick for % 39.7
44.6 Expected goals for % 42.2
-6.0 xGF% relative to team -12.4
23.1 Goals for % 77.8
95.2 PDO 106.0
43 Shot attempts taken 31
Expected goals, all situations
2.7 Expected goals 1.2
0.55 Expected goals per 60 0.23
7.2% Chance per attempt 4.9%
-1.7 Goals above expected -0.2
Rating, in goals
-1.2 Goals above replacement -1.7
-0.2 Wins above replacement -0.3
-1.8 Even-strength offence -2.9
+1.0 Even-strength defence +0.1
0.0 Power play -0.1
-0.4 Penalty kill +0.3
-0.8 Penalties +0.0
Contract
$680K Cap hit $1.6M
$340K Cap dollars per point $800K
-$172K Worth at the going rate -$502K
-$852K Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean