Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Tomas Jurco Nate Thompson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTomas Jurco: Goals, 0.09 a game, 23rd percentileTomas Jurco: Assists, 0.05 a game, 5th percentileTomas Jurco: Points, 0.14 a game, 10th percentileTomas Jurco: Shots, 0.98 a game, 16th percentileTomas Jurco: Hits, 1.14 a game, 50th percentileTomas Jurco: Corsi for %, 51.4%, 65th percentileTomas Jurco: CF% rel, -0.3, 43rd percentileTomas Jurco: On-ice xG %, 51.2%, 59th percentileTomas Jurco: Rating, -0.1 goals above replacement, 22nd percentileTomas Jurco: Chances created, 0.71 xG per 60, 50th percentileTomas Jurco: Shot quality, 8.3% a shot, 74th percentileTomas Jurco: Finishing, -0.8 goals above expected, 46th percentileNate Thompson: Goals, 0.06 a game, 13th percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.06 a game, 8th percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.12 a game, 8th percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 0.86 a game, 10th percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 2.10 a game, 86th percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 49.0%, 37th percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -4.4, 11th percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 50.5%, 53rd percentileNate Thompson: Rating, -0.9 goals above replacement, 14th percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.45 xG per 60, 8th percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 7.6% a shot, 53rd percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, -1.3 goals above expected, 40th percentile
02462040Tomas Jurco 6Nate Thompson 6

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tomas Jurco
Nate Thompson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tomas Jurco R, VGK 2015-16 Nate Thompson C, PHI
44 Games played 49
4 Goals 3
2 Assists 3
6 Points 6
0.14 Points per game 0.12
-6 Plus/minus -1
43 Shots 42
9.3 Shooting % 7.1
50 Hits 103
16 Penalty minutes 47
9:11 Average ice time 11:36
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.4 Corsi for % 49.0
-0.3 CF% relative to team -4.4
49.6 Fenwick for % 50.1
51.2 Expected goals for % 50.5
+2.1 xGF% relative to team -5.6
40.0 Goals for % 45.8
97.7 PDO 98.9
71 Shot attempts taken 69
Expected goals, all situations
4.8 Expected goals 4.3
0.71 Expected goals per 60 0.45
8.3% Chance per attempt 7.6%
-0.8 Goals above expected -1.3
Rating, in goals
-0.1 Goals above replacement -0.9
0.0 Wins above replacement -0.1
-1.1 Even-strength offence -3.0
+0.5 Even-strength defence +1.8
-0.2 Power play -0.1
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.2
-0.4 Penalties -1.3
Contract
$900K Cap hit $1.6M
$150K Cap dollars per point $267K
$510K Worth at the going rate -$7K
-$390K Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean