Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Matt Nieto Trevor Lewis

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMatt Nieto: Goals, 0.20 a game, 61st percentileMatt Nieto: Assists, 0.15 a game, 27th percentileMatt Nieto: Points, 0.35 a game, 40th percentileMatt Nieto: Shots, 1.14 a game, 20th percentileMatt Nieto: Hits, 0.36 a game, 10th percentileMatt Nieto: Corsi for %, 46.1%, 11th percentileMatt Nieto: CF% rel, -2.1, 26th percentileMatt Nieto: On-ice xG %, 44.5%, 10th percentileMatt Nieto: Rating, +2.2 goals above replacement, 46th percentileMatt Nieto: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 6th percentileMatt Nieto: Shot quality, 7.8% a shot, 61st percentileMatt Nieto: Finishing, +4.2 goals above expected, 82nd percentileTrevor Lewis: Goals, 0.21 a game, 61st percentileTrevor Lewis: Assists, 0.18 a game, 36th percentileTrevor Lewis: Points, 0.38 a game, 45th percentileTrevor Lewis: Shots, 1.97 a game, 64th percentileTrevor Lewis: Hits, 1.84 a game, 84th percentileTrevor Lewis: Corsi for %, 50.0%, 48th percentileTrevor Lewis: CF% rel, -1.0, 37th percentileTrevor Lewis: On-ice xG %, 49.2%, 41st percentileTrevor Lewis: Rating, +2.1 goals above replacement, 45th percentileTrevor Lewis: Chances created, 0.63 xG per 60, 29th percentileTrevor Lewis: Shot quality, 6.0% a shot, 7th percentileTrevor Lewis: Finishing, +1.2 goals above expected, 63rd percentile
01020204060Matt Nieto 26Trevor Lewis 26

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Matt Nieto
Trevor Lewis

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Matt Nieto L, PIT 2017-18 Trevor Lewis C, LAK
74 Games played 68
15 Goals 14
11 Assists 12
26 Points 26
0.35 Points per game 0.38
6 Plus/minus -6
84 Shots 134
17.9 Shooting % 10.4
27 Hits 125
14 Penalty minutes 25
14:55 Average ice time 15:14
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.1 Corsi for % 50.0
-2.1 CF% relative to team -1.0
45.1 Fenwick for % 50.1
44.5 Expected goals for % 49.2
-2.4 xGF% relative to team +1.4
50.8 Goals for % 45.1
101.5 PDO 98.6
126 Shot attempts taken 194
Expected goals, all situations
8.8 Expected goals 10.8
0.48 Expected goals per 60 0.63
7.8% Chance per attempt 6.0%
+4.2 Goals above expected +1.2
Rating, in goals
+2.2 Goals above replacement +2.1
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.4
-2.9 Even-strength offence -0.9
+1.0 Even-strength defence +0.5
-0.1 Power play +0.3
+0.5 Penalty kill -0.5
+0.6 Penalties -0.1
Contract
$1M Cap hit $2M
$38K Cap dollars per point $77K
$2M Worth at the going rate $2M
+$984K Value: worth minus cap hit -$40K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean