Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Matt Nieto Riley Nash

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMatt Nieto: Goals, 0.15 a game, 46th percentileMatt Nieto: Assists, 0.21 a game, 47th percentileMatt Nieto: Points, 0.36 a game, 46th percentileMatt Nieto: Shots, 1.88 a game, 59th percentileMatt Nieto: Hits, 0.11 a game, 1st percentileMatt Nieto: Corsi for %, 52.0%, 67th percentileMatt Nieto: CF% rel, -2.7, 23rd percentileMatt Nieto: On-ice xG %, 58.0%, 94th percentileMatt Nieto: Rating, +5.6 goals above replacement, 71st percentileMatt Nieto: Chances created, 0.87 xG per 60, 76th percentileMatt Nieto: Shot quality, 8.6% a shot, 85th percentileMatt Nieto: Finishing, -3.5 goals above expected, 18th percentileRiley Nash: Goals, 0.14 a game, 41st percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.19 a game, 41st percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.33 a game, 40th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.18 a game, 25th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 1.11 a game, 49th percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 50.6%, 49th percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, -0.1, 46th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 52.0%, 64th percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +5.5 goals above replacement, 70th percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.68 xG per 60, 41st percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 8.9% a shot, 91st percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 47th percentile
05101520204060Matt Nieto 24Riley Nash 24

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Matt Nieto
Riley Nash

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Matt Nieto L, PIT 2013-14 Riley Nash C, NYR
66 Games played 73
10 Goals 10
14 Assists 14
24 Points 24
0.36 Points per game 0.33
-4 Plus/minus 0
124 Shots 86
8.1 Shooting % 11.6
7 Hits 81
16 Penalty minutes 29
14:05 Average ice time 12:40
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
52.0 Corsi for % 50.6
-2.7 CF% relative to team -0.1
53.3 Fenwick for % 49.7
58.0 Expected goals for % 52.0
+1.7 xGF% relative to team +4.3
46.3 Goals for % 51.8
98.4 PDO 100.3
181 Shot attempts taken 123
Expected goals, all situations
13.5 Expected goals 10.5
0.87 Expected goals per 60 0.68
8.6% Chance per attempt 8.9%
-3.5 Goals above expected -0.5
Rating, in goals
+5.6 Goals above replacement +5.5
+0.9 Wins above replacement +0.9
+0.7 Even-strength offence -0.1
+1.7 Even-strength defence +2.9
-0.2 Power play -0.1
+0.4 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.5 Penalties +0.3
Contract
$759K Cap hit $575K
$32K Cap dollars per point $24K
$3.7M Worth at the going rate $3.7M
+$3M Value: worth minus cap hit +$3.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean